Changes

162 bytes added ,  16:13, 13 October 2008
More stuff
Line 69: Line 69:     
::I wanted www.wikipediacritics.com, but after I told Somey that I wanted the freedom to launch that and to advertise it on WR as our compromise, Somey turned around and registered that domain name and made it redirect to Wikipedia Review, just to be nasty.  I set up a ProBoards site, but it is not the same, since I can't advertise it.  I really want to have Wikipedia Review run like it was in the beginning, before all of the power trips.  I don't think that it needs any change, it just needs to go back to what it was like to start with.  Well, perhaps a few changes.  For one thing, I wouldn't allow any anti-critics people in at all.  Obviously some of the current staff at WR would not be made staff if it was run properly, but some of them would stay staff too, depending on how they got to be staff really.  But when something is stolen, it is really gone, and there isn't much I can do but to try to advertise the truth of it.  Much like how WR couldn't change Wikipedia, all it could do was to warn people about its dangers.  It is all a bit depressing really, since that's the 2nd site I ran which got stolen from me at the peak of its popularity, and then run into the ground. [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 06:44, 12 October 2008 (PDT)
 
::I wanted www.wikipediacritics.com, but after I told Somey that I wanted the freedom to launch that and to advertise it on WR as our compromise, Somey turned around and registered that domain name and made it redirect to Wikipedia Review, just to be nasty.  I set up a ProBoards site, but it is not the same, since I can't advertise it.  I really want to have Wikipedia Review run like it was in the beginning, before all of the power trips.  I don't think that it needs any change, it just needs to go back to what it was like to start with.  Well, perhaps a few changes.  For one thing, I wouldn't allow any anti-critics people in at all.  Obviously some of the current staff at WR would not be made staff if it was run properly, but some of them would stay staff too, depending on how they got to be staff really.  But when something is stolen, it is really gone, and there isn't much I can do but to try to advertise the truth of it.  Much like how WR couldn't change Wikipedia, all it could do was to warn people about its dangers.  It is all a bit depressing really, since that's the 2nd site I ran which got stolen from me at the peak of its popularity, and then run into the ground. [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 06:44, 12 October 2008 (PDT)
 +
 +
== More stuff ==
 +
 +
I added [[Wikipedia Vandalism Study|this]], which is of your hand but not on MWB, I think. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 09:13, 13 October 2008 (PDT)
3,209

edits