Line 11:
Line 11:
A '''relation''' <math>L\!</math> is defined by specifying two mathematical objects as its constituent parts:
A '''relation''' <math>L\!</math> is defined by specifying two mathematical objects as its constituent parts:
−
:* The first part is called the ''figure'' of <math>L,\!</math> notated as <math>\operatorname{figure}(L).</math> or <math>\operatorname{fig}(L).</math>
+
{| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%"
+
|
+
<p>The first part is called the ''figure'' of <math>L,\!</math> notated as <math>\operatorname{figure}(L).</math></p>
+
|-
+
|
+
<p>The second part is called the ''ground'' of <math>L,\!</math> notated as <math>\operatorname{ground}(L).</math></p>
+
|}
−
:* The second part is called the ''ground'' of <math>L,\!</math> notated as <math>\operatorname{ground}(L)</math> or <math>\operatorname{grd}(L).</math>
+
In the special case of a ''finitary relation'', for concreteness a ''<math>k\!</math>-place relation'', the concepts of figure and ground are defined as follows:
−
In the special case of a '''finitary relation''', for concreteness a '''<math>k\!</math>-place relation''', the concepts of figure and ground are defined as follows:
+
{| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%"
+
|
+
<p>The ''ground'' of <math>L\!</math> is a sequence of <math>k\!</math> nonempty sets, <math>X_1, \ldots, X_k,</math> called the ''domains'' of the relation <math>L.\!</math></p>
+
|-
+
|
+
<p>The ''figure'' of <math>L\!</math> is a subset of the cartesian product taken over the domains of <math>L.\!</math></p>
+
|-
+
|
+
<p>In sum we have: <math>\operatorname{figure}(L) ~\subseteq~ \operatorname{ground}(L) ~=~ X_1 \times \ldots, \times X_k.</math></p>
+
|}
−
:* The '''ground''' of ''L'' is a [[sequence]] of ''k'' [[nonempty]] [[set]]s, ''X''<sub>1</sub>, …, ''X''<sub>''k''</sub>, called the ''domains'' of the relation ''L''.
+
Strictly speaking, then, the relation <math>L\!</math> is an ordered pair of mathematical objects, <math>L = (\operatorname{figure}(L), \operatorname{ground}(L)),</math> but it is customary in loose speech to use the single name <math>L\!</math> in a systematically equivocal fashion, taking it to denote either the pair <math>L = (\operatorname{figure}(L), \operatorname{ground}(L))</math> or the figure <math>\operatorname{figure}(L).</math> There is usually no confusion about this so long as the ground of the relation can be gathered from context.
−
−
:* The '''figure''' of ''L'' is a [[subset]] of the [[cartesian product]] taken over the domains of ''L'', that is, ''F''(''L'') ⊆ ''G''(''L'') = ''X''<sub>1</sub> × … × ''X''<sub>''k''</sub>.
−
−
Strictly speaking, then, the relation ''L'' consists of a couple of things, ''L'' = (''F''(''L''), ''G''(''L'')), but it is customary in loose speech to use the single name ''L'' in a systematically equivocal fashion, taking it to denote either the couple ''L'' = (''F''(''L''), ''G''(''L'')) or the figure ''F''(''L''). There is usually no confusion about this so long as the ground of the relation can be gathered from context.
==Definition==
==Definition==