Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Wednesday September 10, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 641: Line 641:  
==Note 13==
 
==Note 13==
   −
<pre>
+
I think that it ought to be clear at this point that we need a more systematic symbolic method for computing the differentials of logical transformations, using the term ''differential'' in a loose way at present for all sorts of finite differences and derivatives, leaving it to another discussion to sharpen up its more exact technical senses.
I think that it ought to be clear at this point that we
+
 
need a more systematic symbolic method for computing the
+
For convenience of reference, let's recast our current example in the following form:
differentials of logical transformations, using the term
  −
"differential" in a loose way at present for all sorts of
  −
finite differences and derivatives, leaving it to another
  −
discussion to sharpen up its more exact technical senses.
     −
For convenience of reference, let's recast our current
+
{| align="center" cellpadding="8" width="95%"
example in the form F = <f, g> = <((u)(v)), ((u, v))>.
+
| <math>F ~=~ (f, g) ~=~ ( ~\underline{((}~ u ~\underline{)(}~ v ~\underline{))}~, ~\underline{((}~ u ~,~ v ~\underline{))}~ ).</math>
 +
|}
    +
<pre>
 
In their application to this logical transformation the operators
 
In their application to this logical transformation the operators
 
E and D respectively produce the "enlarged map" EF = <Ef, Eg> and
 
E and D respectively produce the "enlarged map" EF = <Ef, Eg> and
12,089

edits

Navigation menu