Difference between revisions of "Talk:Logical graph"
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Sunday October 26, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to searchJon Awbrey (talk | contribs) (logical equivalence problem from the drexel math forum) |
Jon Awbrey (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Place for Discussion== | ==Place for Discussion== | ||
| − | <br><math>\ldots</math><br> | + | <br> |
| + | <math>\ldots</math> | ||
| + | <br> | ||
==Logical Equivalence Problem== | ==Logical Equivalence Problem== | ||
Revision as of 03:46, 2 December 2008
Notes & Queries
- Jon Awbrey 20:20, 1 February 2008 (PST)
Place for Discussion
\(\ldots\)
Logical Equivalence Problem
Date: 30 Nov 2008, 2:00 AM
Author: Jon Awbrey
Subject: Re: logical equivalence problem
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
required to show: ~(p <=> q) is equivalent to (~q) <=> p
in logical graphs, the required equivalence looks like this:
q o o p q o
| | |
p o o q o o p
\ / | |
o p o o--o q
| \ /
@ = @
we have a theorem that says:
y o xy o
| |
x @ = x @
see: http://www.mywikibiz.com/Logical_graph#C2.__Generation_theorem
applying this twice to the left hand side of the required equation:
q o o p pq o o pq
| | | |
p o o q p o o q
\ / \ /
o o
| |
@ = @
by collection, the reverse of distribution, we get:
p q
o o
pq \ /
o o
\ /
@
but this is the same result that we get from one application of
double negation to the right hand side of the required equation.
QED
Jon Awbrey
PS. I will copy this to the Inquiry List:
http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
since I know it preserves the trees.
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o