Difference between revisions of "Talk:Criticism of crowdsourcing"
Jon Awbrey (talk | contribs) (→Notes & Queries: comment) |
Jon Awbrey (talk | contribs) (→Notes & Queries: bold speaker tags) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Notes & Queries== | ==Notes & Queries== | ||
| − | JA: I guess my first criticism would be a worry about the name "crowdsourcing". It clangs me wrong somehow. [[User:Jon Awbrey|Jon Awbrey]] 12:12, 8 October 2008 (PDT) | + | '''JA:''' I guess my first criticism would be a worry about the name "crowdsourcing". It clangs me wrong somehow. [[User:Jon Awbrey|Jon Awbrey]] 12:12, 8 October 2008 (PDT) |
My thoughts: Do I even have real-world credentials? Now there's a problem. Why not have a message board ''and'' a wiki? There are good and bad points to having either one. | My thoughts: Do I even have real-world credentials? Now there's a problem. Why not have a message board ''and'' a wiki? There are good and bad points to having either one. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
On the thought of what domain name to use: I think MimboJimbo.com would be suitable. — [[User:Nathan|<span style="color:#3971DE">'''Nathan'''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Nathan|<span style="color:#3971DE">'''talk'''</span>]])</sup> <sub>/ <em>19:15, 8 October 2008 (UTC)</em></sub> | On the thought of what domain name to use: I think MimboJimbo.com would be suitable. — [[User:Nathan|<span style="color:#3971DE">'''Nathan'''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:Nathan|<span style="color:#3971DE">'''talk'''</span>]])</sup> <sub>/ <em>19:15, 8 October 2008 (UTC)</em></sub> | ||
| − | JA: I've grown weary of fixating on (1) Wikipedia (2) Wikipedia Personae. Yes, most of our concrete data and hard experience comes from those sources — though I did see the very same dynamics in Citizendium despite the one bug fix that Sanger tried to implement — but we need to view that data and experience as cases under generic concepts, and focus on the genus not the individuals. So "MimboJimbo" would probably lead us down the wrong path. [[User:Jon Awbrey|Jon Awbrey]] 12:30, 8 October 2008 (PDT) | + | '''JA:''' I've grown weary of fixating on (1) Wikipedia (2) Wikipedia Personae. Yes, most of our concrete data and hard experience comes from those sources — though I did see the very same dynamics in Citizendium despite the one bug fix that Sanger tried to implement — but we need to view that data and experience as cases under generic concepts, and focus on the genus not the individuals. So "MimboJimbo" would probably lead us down the wrong path. [[User:Jon Awbrey|Jon Awbrey]] 12:30, 8 October 2008 (PDT) |
Revision as of 19:34, 8 October 2008
Notes & Queries
JA: I guess my first criticism would be a worry about the name "crowdsourcing". It clangs me wrong somehow. Jon Awbrey 12:12, 8 October 2008 (PDT)
My thoughts: Do I even have real-world credentials? Now there's a problem. Why not have a message board and a wiki? There are good and bad points to having either one.
On the thought of what domain name to use: I think MimboJimbo.com would be suitable. — Nathan (talk) / 19:15, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
JA: I've grown weary of fixating on (1) Wikipedia (2) Wikipedia Personae. Yes, most of our concrete data and hard experience comes from those sources — though I did see the very same dynamics in Citizendium despite the one bug fix that Sanger tried to implement — but we need to view that data and experience as cases under generic concepts, and focus on the genus not the individuals. So "MimboJimbo" would probably lead us down the wrong path. Jon Awbrey 12:30, 8 October 2008 (PDT)
