MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Saturday September 06, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to search
31 bytes added
, 02:59, 31 August 2007
Line 865: |
Line 865: |
| Assertions of these relations can be read in various ways, for example: | | Assertions of these relations can be read in various ways, for example: |
| | | |
− | <br> | + | <br><font face="courier new"> |
− | {| align="center" border="1" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" style="background:lightcyan; font-weight:bold; text-align:left; width:90%" | + | {| align="center" border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" style="background:lightcyan; font-weight:bold; text-align:left; width:96%" |
| |- style="background:paleturquoise" | | |- style="background:paleturquoise" |
| | ''j'' : ''x'' <font face="system"><s><</s></font> ''y'' | | | ''j'' : ''x'' <font face="system"><s><</s></font> ''y'' |
Line 931: |
Line 931: |
| | ''j'' forms ''y'' above ''x''. | | | ''j'' forms ''y'' above ''x''. |
| |} | | |} |
− | <br> | + | </font><br> |
− | | |
| | | |
| In making these free interpretations of genres and motifs, one needs to read them in a ''logical'' rather than a ''cognitive'' sense. A statement like "''j'' thinks ''x'' an instance of ''y'' " should be understood as saying that "''j'' is a thought with the logical import that ''x'' is an instance of ''y'' ", and a statement like "''j'' proposes ''y'' a property of ''x'' " should be taken to mean that "''j'' is a proposition to the effect that ''y'' is a property of ''x'' ". | | In making these free interpretations of genres and motifs, one needs to read them in a ''logical'' rather than a ''cognitive'' sense. A statement like "''j'' thinks ''x'' an instance of ''y'' " should be understood as saying that "''j'' is a thought with the logical import that ''x'' is an instance of ''y'' ", and a statement like "''j'' proposes ''y'' a property of ''x'' " should be taken to mean that "''j'' is a proposition to the effect that ''y'' is a property of ''x'' ". |