Difference between revisions of "The case against Gwen Gale"
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
===Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Wilkes, Wyss and Onefortyone=== | ===Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Wilkes, Wyss and Onefortyone=== | ||
Most evidences against Wyss [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Wilkes,_Wyss_and_Onefortyone/Evidence presented at this page] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Wilkes,_Wyss_and_Onefortyone/Workshop at this page] were removed either by herself, when she became an administrator, or by another administrators. For example one of the evidences was: | Most evidences against Wyss [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Wilkes,_Wyss_and_Onefortyone/Evidence presented at this page] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Wilkes,_Wyss_and_Onefortyone/Workshop at this page] were removed either by herself, when she became an administrator, or by another administrators. For example one of the evidences was: | ||
| − | {{cquote|Wyss is still showing a lack of insight. On 16 December 2005, he/she says on his/her talk page: "Too many active Wikipedians are wankers, fiddlers, fools and trolls which includes several members of arbcomm who are more interested in publishing unsupported gay celebrity gossip than they are in writing an encyclopedia to academic standards." See | + | {{cquote|[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_arbitration%2FWilkes%2C_Wyss_and_Onefortyone%2FWorkshop&action=historysubmit&diff=31671855&oldid=30963842 Wyss is still showing a lack of insight. On 16 December 2005, he/she says on his/her talk page: "Too many active Wikipedians are wankers, fiddlers, fools and trolls which includes several members of arbcomm who are more interested in publishing unsupported gay celebrity gossip than they are in writing an encyclopedia to academic standards." See (See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Wyss&diff=31560139&oldid=31558060). Onefortyone 23:50, 16 December 2005 (UTC)]}} but, if one is to click on the link with the provided URL address, one will get [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Wyss&diff=31560139&oldid=31558060 a page that states: "The relevant page of the wiki was "User:Wyss" and the requested data (for error checking purposes) was: (Diff: 31558060, 31560139)"]. Such deletion of talk pages history violates basic wikipedia policies. |
[[Category:Wikipedia]] | [[Category:Wikipedia]] | ||
Revision as of 22:16, 11 December 2011
Heidi Wyss was born in 1975 in Geneva, and got her education in Great Britain. She describes herself as "a word witch and a lesbian separatist, third wave feminist". That "witchy" theme is very close to Heidi Wyss. In an interview she gave about her book Gormglaith (novel) she said that she wanted her readers to understand that "Witchy girls have more fun." "The Witch" was also a user name of one of the socks Wyss used to violate her topic ban, the ban that was described like this "Wyss is banned from making any edit related to a person's alleged homosexuality or bisexuality. The clauses "any edit" and "related to homosexuality or bisexuality" shall be interpreted broadly; this remedy is intended, for example, to prohibit correcting the spelling of "gay"."
A "witchy" girl Heidi Wyss became the Wikipedia's witch, when she became wikipedia administrator Gwen Gale.
Heidi Wyss's wikipedia story
Heidi Wyss's wikipedia story begun in 2004, when after making a few edits as IP (without making account) Wyss made an account, giving it its her real life name "Wyss. User Wyss started a few articles, but in November of 2005 she became involved parties in the Wikipedia requests for arbitration named "Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Wilkes, Wyss and Onefortyone".
Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Wilkes, Wyss and Onefortyone
Most evidences against Wyss presented at this page and at this page were removed either by herself, when she became an administrator, or by another administrators. For example one of the evidences was:
| “ | Insert the text of the quote here, without quotation marks. | ” |
but, if one is to click on the link with the provided URL address, one will get a page that states: "The relevant page of the wiki was "User:Wyss" and the requested data (for error checking purposes) was: (Diff: 31558060, 31560139)". Such deletion of talk pages history violates basic wikipedia policies.
