Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Saturday October 25, 2025
Jump to navigationJump to search

User:Jon Awbrey/EOI (view source)

Revision as of 15:10, 23 December 2010

2,426 bytes removed ,  15:10, 23 December 2010
segment text
Line 1,370: Line 1,370:  
Figure 3.  Signs of Rain Viewed in Their Natural Context
 
Figure 3.  Signs of Rain Viewed in Their Natural Context
 
</pre>
 
</pre>
 +
 +
==Discussion Note 1==
    
<pre>
 
<pre>
−
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
  −
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 1
  −
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
  −
   
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
TG = Tom Gollier
 
TG = Tom Gollier
Line 1,437: Line 1,433:  
     change, although I'm sure there have been limits imposed.  How did
 
     change, although I'm sure there have been limits imposed.  How did
 
     that old song go? "We'll have fun 'til daddy takes the T-Bird away"?
 
     that old song go? "We'll have fun 'til daddy takes the T-Bird away"?
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
==Discussion Note 2==
−
 
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 2
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
TG = Tom Gollier
 
TG = Tom Gollier
Line 1,507: Line 1,501:     
It's fun^3, of course.
 
It's fun^3, of course.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
==Discussion Note 3==
−
 
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 3
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
TG = Tom Gollier
 
TG = Tom Gollier
Line 1,587: Line 1,579:     
Let me pause here, and see if we have an understanding on that point.
 
Let me pause here, and see if we have an understanding on that point.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
==Discussion Note 4==
−
 
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 4
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
TG = Tom Gollier
 
TG = Tom Gollier
Line 1,669: Line 1,659:  
and chaffs the rest.  In short, it is but an alias for the entire
 
and chaffs the rest.  In short, it is but an alias for the entire
 
sign relation as a subset of a cartesian product, L c O x S x I.
 
sign relation as a subset of a cartesian product, L c O x S x I.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
==Discussion Note 5==
−
 
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 5
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
TG = Tom Gollier
 
TG = Tom Gollier
Line 1,718: Line 1,706:  
including abstract, conjectural, contingent, hypothetical,
 
including abstract, conjectural, contingent, hypothetical,
 
intentional, and potential objects.
 
intentional, and potential objects.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
==Discussion Note 6==
−
 
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 6
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
TG = Tom Gollier
 
TG = Tom Gollier
Line 1,770: Line 1,756:  
observations are figured in relief against
 
observations are figured in relief against
 
the ground of his prior expectations.
 
the ground of his prior expectations.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
==Discussion Note 7==
−
 
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 7
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
TG = Tom Gollier
 
TG = Tom Gollier
Line 1,808: Line 1,792:     
Too close to the whiching hour -- will have to save the rest for tomorrow.
 
Too close to the whiching hour -- will have to save the rest for tomorrow.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
==Discussion Note 8==
−
 
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 8
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
TG = Tom Gollier
 
TG = Tom Gollier
Line 1,841: Line 1,823:  
apodictic, as there may be types of probable reasoning that
 
apodictic, as there may be types of probable reasoning that
 
follow the deductive pattern, only less certainly.
 
follow the deductive pattern, only less certainly.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
==Discussion Note 9==
−
 
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 9
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
Here's the "New List" text about the relations between
 
Here's the "New List" text about the relations between
 
the types of signs and the types of inference, that is,
 
the types of signs and the types of inference, that is,
Line 1,971: Line 1,951:  
| http://www.peirce.org/writings/p32.html
 
| http://www.peirce.org/writings/p32.html
 
| http://members.door.net/arisbe/menu/library/bycsp/newlist/nl-frame.htm
 
| http://members.door.net/arisbe/menu/library/bycsp/newlist/nl-frame.htm
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
==Discussion Note 10==
−
 
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 10
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
JD = John Dewey
 
JD = John Dewey
Line 2,145: Line 2,123:  
but the inferences to rain or fire are not
 
but the inferences to rain or fire are not
 
certain in these cases, so not deductive.
 
certain in these cases, so not deductive.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
==Discussion Note 11==
−
 
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 11
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
AB = Auke van Breemen
 
AB = Auke van Breemen
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
Line 2,176: Line 2,152:  
try again.  Could you lay out your reasoning here in
 
try again.  Could you lay out your reasoning here in
 
more detail for me?
 
more detail for me?
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
==Discussion Note 12==
−
 
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 12
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
TG = Tom Gollier
 
TG = Tom Gollier
Line 2,278: Line 2,252:  
signs and inquiry, and also the development
 
signs and inquiry, and also the development
 
that Peirce and much later Dewey underwent.
 
that Peirce and much later Dewey underwent.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
==Discussion Note 13==
−
 
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 13
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
AB = Auke van Breemen
 
AB = Auke van Breemen
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
Line 2,404: Line 2,376:     
Many thanks for the explanations ...
 
Many thanks for the explanations ...
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
==Discussion Note 14==
−
 
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 14
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
TG = Tom Gollier
 
TG = Tom Gollier
Line 2,490: Line 2,460:  
was forced to develop the logic of relatives
 
was forced to develop the logic of relatives
 
in order to explain how explanation works.
 
in order to explain how explanation works.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
==Discussion Note 15==
−
 
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 15
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
TG = Tom Gollier
 
TG = Tom Gollier
Line 2,534: Line 2,502:     
And so it goes ...
 
And so it goes ...
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
==Discussion Note 16==
−
 
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 16
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
AB = Auke van Breemen
 
AB = Auke van Breemen
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
Line 2,617: Line 2,583:  
     So, my apologies in probable failings to take
 
     So, my apologies in probable failings to take
 
     into account earlier relevant messages.  
 
     into account earlier relevant messages.  
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
==Discussion Note 17==
−
 
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 17
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
KM = Kirsti Maattanen
 
KM = Kirsti Maattanen
Line 2,693: Line 2,657:  
treasured nuggests tomorrow,
 
treasured nuggests tomorrow,
 
but I have to break for today.
 
but I have to break for today.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
==Discussion Note 18==
−
 
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 18
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
Auke, Kirsti, List,
 
Auke, Kirsti, List,
   Line 2,845: Line 2,807:  
| trans. by Eric Mosbacher and James Strachey,
 
| trans. by Eric Mosbacher and James Strachey,
 
| intro. by Ernst Kris, Basic Books, New York, NY, 1954.
 
| intro. by Ernst Kris, Basic Books, New York, NY, 1954.
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
==Discussion Note 19==
−
 
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 19
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
KM = Kirsti Maattanen
 
KM = Kirsti Maattanen
Line 2,990: Line 2,950:     
PSY.  http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-November/thread.html#1869
 
PSY.  http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-November/thread.html#1869
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
==Discussion Note 20==
−
 
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 20
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
KM = Kirsti Määttänen
 
KM = Kirsti Määttänen
   Line 3,010: Line 2,968:  
     But, in order for that to happen, there should be real interdisciplinary
 
     But, in order for that to happen, there should be real interdisciplinary
 
     dialogue.  Is there, really?
 
     dialogue.  Is there, really?
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
==Discussion Note 21==
−
 
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 21
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
TG = Tom Gollier
 
TG = Tom Gollier
Line 3,053: Line 3,009:  
Once again you have caught me just before it's time to go to dinner ---
 
Once again you have caught me just before it's time to go to dinner ---
 
But I promise to come back re-victualized for your questings ...
 
But I promise to come back re-victualized for your questings ...
 +
</pre>
   −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
+
==Discussion Note 22==
−
 
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 22
  −
 
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
      +
<pre>
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
JA = Jon Awbrey
 
TG = Tom Gollier
 
TG = Tom Gollier
Line 3,121: Line 3,075:  
"inductive" reasoning.
 
"inductive" reasoning.
 
It's all there.
 
It's all there.
−
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
  −
  −
EOI.  Discussion Note 23
  −
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
  −
  −
  −
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
  −
  −
EOI.  Discussion Work Area
  −
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
  −
  −
  −
  −
o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
   
</pre>
 
</pre>
  
Jon Awbrey
12,122

edits

Retrieved from "https://mywikibiz.com/Special:MobileDiff/131370"

Navigation menu