Changes

Line 159: Line 159:  
If the faculty of inquiry is a coherent power, then it has an active or instrumental face, a passive or objective face, and a substantial body of connections between them.
 
If the faculty of inquiry is a coherent power, then it has an active or instrumental face, a passive or objective face, and a substantial body of connections between them.
   −
:: '''<code>y = {?}</code>'''
+
:: <math>y = \{ ? \}</math>
    
In giving the current inquiry a reflexive cast, as inquiry into inquiry, I have brought inquiry face to face with itself, inditing it to apply its action in pursuing a knowledge of its passion.
 
In giving the current inquiry a reflexive cast, as inquiry into inquiry, I have brought inquiry face to face with itself, inditing it to apply its action in pursuing a knowledge of its passion.
   −
:: '''<code>y<sub>0</sub> = y&nbsp;<math>\cdot</math>&nbsp;y = {?}{?}</code>'''
+
:: <math>y_0 = y \cdot y = \{ ? \} \{ ? \}</math>
    
If this juxtaposition of characters is to have a meaningful issue, then the fullness of its instrumental and objective aspects must have recourse to easier actions and simpler objects.
 
If this juxtaposition of characters is to have a meaningful issue, then the fullness of its instrumental and objective aspects must have recourse to easier actions and simpler objects.
   −
:: '''<code>y >= {?,&nbsp;?}</code>'''
+
:: <math>y >\!\!= \{ ? , ? \}</math>
    
Looking for an edge on each face of inquiry, as a plausible option for beginning to apply one to the other, I find what seems a likely pair.  I begin with an aspect of instrumental inquiry that is easy to do, namely ''discussion'', along with an aspect of objective inquiry that is unavoidable to discuss, namely ''formalization''.
 
Looking for an edge on each face of inquiry, as a plausible option for beginning to apply one to the other, I find what seems a likely pair.  I begin with an aspect of instrumental inquiry that is easy to do, namely ''discussion'', along with an aspect of objective inquiry that is unavoidable to discuss, namely ''formalization''.
   −
:: '''<code>y >= {disc,&nbsp;form}</code>'''
+
:: <math>y >\!\!= \{ \operatorname{discussion} , \operatorname{formalization} \}</math>
    
In accord with this plan, the body of this section is devoted to a discussion of formalization.
 
In accord with this plan, the body of this section is devoted to a discussion of formalization.
   −
:: '''<code>y<sub>0</sub> = y&nbsp;<math>\cdot</math>&nbsp;y >= {d,&nbsp;f}{d,&nbsp;f} >= {f}{d}</code>'''
+
:: <math>y_0 = y \cdot y >\!\!= \{ d , f \} \{ d , f \} >\!\!= \{ f \} \{ d \}</math>
    
====1.3.2.  Discussion of Discussion====
 
====1.3.2.  Discussion of Discussion====
12,089

edits