Changes

Line 8: Line 8:  
It is one of a series of translations and discussions to do with the question of whether a <i>per se</i> proposition (one whose predicate is included in the subject,  
 
It is one of a series of translations and discussions to do with the question of whether a <i>per se</i> proposition (one whose predicate is included in the subject,  
 
such as 'every man is an animal') is true when the subject does not exist.   
 
such as 'every man is an animal') is true when the subject does not exist.   
Other texts from the late thirteenth century which include work by Duns Scotus (<b>link to follow</b>), <a href="sigerquaestio22.htm">Siger of Brabant,  
+
Other texts from the late thirteenth century which include work by Duns Scotus (<b>link to follow</b>), [[Directory:Logic Museum/Siger of Brabant/Quaestiones in Metaphysicam 20-21|Siger of Brabant]], [[Directory:Logic Museum/Simon of Faversham/On Sophistical Refutations|Simon of Faversham]], [[Directory:Logic Museum/Radulphus Brito/Quaestiones super Artem veterem|Radulphus Brito]] and others.
<a href="simonfavnullohomine.htm">Simon of Faversham, <a href="brito-quaestiones.htm">Radulphus Brito and others.
      
Two of the four questions are included here.  [[#I|Question I]] is whether Every man is 'of necessity' an animal.   
 
Two of the four questions are included here.  [[#I|Question I]] is whether Every man is 'of necessity' an animal.   
3,209

edits