Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday May 31, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 296: Line 296:  
:Anyway, relating to this issue, it is a very controversial one.  I initially used the internet with my real name, but I ended up getting a lot of stupid phone calls that led to me having to change my phone number (and even making it a silent number), and then later someone found out my real name and made up a huge smear against me in 2002/03, that had my real name and real details next to things that weren't true.  That person, for the record, claimed to be using their real name and real details in doing so, but they really weren't.  Also note that Poetlister had claimed various real names, but they weren't real names.  Using real names or not is not enough, nor is it helpful.  If people individually want to do that, by all means they should be able to, but it shouldn't be enforced.  Anything that is libellous should obviously be removed, but that should be the case whether the person saying it uses their real name or not.  [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 23:11, 11 October 2008 (PDT)
 
:Anyway, relating to this issue, it is a very controversial one.  I initially used the internet with my real name, but I ended up getting a lot of stupid phone calls that led to me having to change my phone number (and even making it a silent number), and then later someone found out my real name and made up a huge smear against me in 2002/03, that had my real name and real details next to things that weren't true.  That person, for the record, claimed to be using their real name and real details in doing so, but they really weren't.  Also note that Poetlister had claimed various real names, but they weren't real names.  Using real names or not is not enough, nor is it helpful.  If people individually want to do that, by all means they should be able to, but it shouldn't be enforced.  Anything that is libellous should obviously be removed, but that should be the case whether the person saying it uses their real name or not.  [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 23:11, 11 October 2008 (PDT)
   −
== Not everyone is going to agree ==
+
==Not everyone is going to agree==
    
When Wikipedia Review began, it had no clear purpose.  As Igor Alexander originally said "This is a Wikipedia anti-fan site".  It was designed to destroy Wikipedia.
 
When Wikipedia Review began, it had no clear purpose.  As Igor Alexander originally said "This is a Wikipedia anti-fan site".  It was designed to destroy Wikipedia.
Line 313: Line 313:     
Wikipedia Review has, through its history, been overrun with interpersonal conflict disrupting the actual criticism.  Ultimately, people are going to disagree, and really, who cares?  So long as they aren't doing anything illegal, does it really matter?  Most of the interpersonal conflict issues, though, were started by people trying to destroy the site.  I really see no reason why they should even be included in the site at all.  No Wikipedia administrators allowed.  No vehemently pro-Wikipedia people allowed.  Nobody who hates the site allowed.  Why allow it?  Just have people that are trying to help the site.  Less interpersonal conflict then, and it is more genuine.  Then you can encourage people who are good for the site, and people who love Wikipedia can quite simply go elsewhere.  [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 20:51, 11 October 2008 (PDT)
 
Wikipedia Review has, through its history, been overrun with interpersonal conflict disrupting the actual criticism.  Ultimately, people are going to disagree, and really, who cares?  So long as they aren't doing anything illegal, does it really matter?  Most of the interpersonal conflict issues, though, were started by people trying to destroy the site.  I really see no reason why they should even be included in the site at all.  No Wikipedia administrators allowed.  No vehemently pro-Wikipedia people allowed.  Nobody who hates the site allowed.  Why allow it?  Just have people that are trying to help the site.  Less interpersonal conflict then, and it is more genuine.  Then you can encourage people who are good for the site, and people who love Wikipedia can quite simply go elsewhere.  [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 20:51, 11 October 2008 (PDT)
 +
 +
==Now Is The Wiki Of Our Discontent==
12,080

edits

Navigation menu