Difference between revisions of "Directory:MyWikiBiz/Paid editing"
(New keyword, based on feedback from a recent prospect.) |
(→Evolution of the editing service: thus xx therefore) |
||
| (16 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE: Paid editing of Wikipedia}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE: Paid editing of Wikipedia}} | ||
| − | [[Image:Kohs_Wikipedia_original.jpg|thumb|225px|right|MyWikiBiz founder, AP photo, 2007.]]Launched in 2006, the [[Directory:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] enterprise has authored dozens of encyclopedic articles about companies, products, and individual persons. These articles | + | [[Image:Kohs_Wikipedia_original.jpg|thumb|225px|right|MyWikiBiz founder, AP photo, 2007.]]Launched in 2006, the [[Directory:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]] enterprise has authored dozens of encyclopedic articles about companies, products, and individual persons. These articles were published under terms of free, copyleft licenses, in hopes that free-content sites (primarily [[Wikipedia]]) would disseminate them to vast audiences for wider use. MyWikiBiz has not directly edited Wikipedia in exchange for payment, though, for a number of years. Its founder, Gregory Kohs, is [[Directory:MyWikiBiz/Paid_editing#Contact_MyWikiBiz|available]] to consult businesses and individuals who have questions about how to best engage with Wikipedia and other free-content sites. |
==Evolution of the editing service== | ==Evolution of the editing service== | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
From August until October 2006, MyWikiBiz created content for about 10 articles that found their way to Wikipedia. Three of them were disclosed to the "powers that be" at Wikipedia, which led to two of them being deleted, and the remaining one being savaged by Wikipedia co-founder [[Criticism of Jimmy Wales|Jimmy Wales]]. In the pinnacle of hypocrisy, an administrator who acted as Wales' lap-dog later plagiarized the original MyWikiBiz content and attempted (unsuccessfully, as he was caught red-handed) to [[Criticism_of_Jimmy_Wales#Tolerance_of_plagiarism|claim the content ''ab initio'']] as his own. | From August until October 2006, MyWikiBiz created content for about 10 articles that found their way to Wikipedia. Three of them were disclosed to the "powers that be" at Wikipedia, which led to two of them being deleted, and the remaining one being savaged by Wikipedia co-founder [[Criticism of Jimmy Wales|Jimmy Wales]]. In the pinnacle of hypocrisy, an administrator who acted as Wales' lap-dog later plagiarized the original MyWikiBiz content and attempted (unsuccessfully, as he was caught red-handed) to [[Criticism_of_Jimmy_Wales#Tolerance_of_plagiarism|claim the content ''ab initio'']] as his own. | ||
| − | What about the other seven articles that were not disclosed? All are beautifully residing to this day within Wikipedia, thoughtfully tended to by the editing community. | + | What about the other seven articles that were not disclosed? All are beautifully residing to this day within Wikipedia, thoughtfully tended to by the editing community. After the success of these seven articles, MyWikiBiz then added many dozens more Wikipedia pages and improvements on behalf of clients. Only two or three articles have ever been overturned by the Wikipedia administrative community. |
Therefore, we at MyWikiBiz have concluded that content decisions at Wikipedia are not at all about "the quality of the contribution", but rather, "the provenance of the contribution". If the editor is embedded in the community, their content generally stays; but if the editor is new and unfamiliar, their content will generally be deprecated or removed with prejudice. | Therefore, we at MyWikiBiz have concluded that content decisions at Wikipedia are not at all about "the quality of the contribution", but rather, "the provenance of the contribution". If the editor is embedded in the community, their content generally stays; but if the editor is new and unfamiliar, their content will generally be deprecated or removed with prejudice. | ||
| − | + | As of June 16, 2014, the Wikimedia Foundation has implemented in its Terms of Use a new section entitled "[http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use#4._Refraining_from_Certain_Activities Paid contributions without disclosure]". The key aspect of this section is that users: | |
| − | <blockquote>''... | + | <blockquote>''...must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.''</blockquote> |
| − | + | Therefore, when you engage the services of MyWikiBiz, you are '''paying for the expertise of MyWikiBiz and its affiliate editors'''; that is, you are compensating us for our research skills, writing style, and editorial review time. Your payment also obtains our knowledge of policies and guidelines on Wikipedia and other Wikimedia Foundation projects. You agree that '''you are making no payment for any content contributions''' on Wikipedia or other Wikimedia Foundation projects. MyWikiBiz will only execute content contributions on Wikipedia or other Wikimedia Foundation projects through other editors-in-good-standing, as a ''personal courtesy'' at or near the end of our consultative project. MyWikiBiz may not receive or expect to receive any compensation for directly publishing or editing content on Wikipedia or other Wikimedia Foundation projects, and thus no refunds or rebates will be offered to you as the result of any content outcomes on Wikipedia or other Wikimedia Foundation projects which are ultimately outside of our control. Because of these service terms, '''MyWikiBiz and its affiliate editors are exempt from the Wikimedia Foundation Terms of Use section''' about "Paid contributions without disclosure". Since we neither receive nor expect to receive compensation for any of our contributions to Wikipedia or other Wikimedia Foundation projects, we need not make disclosure of our employer(s), client(s), or affiliation(s). So, when you engage in a consultation with MyWikiBiz, you are assured of privacy and confidentiality regarding your intentions (past, present, and future) regarding Wikipedia! | |
| + | |||
| + | Further worthy of note is that a representative of the Wikimedia Foundation (James Alexander, 19 April 2017) contacted the founder of MyWikiBiz via e-mail to, "notify you that you are banned from all Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) websites, platforms and activities. This includes but is not limited to, any site listed at www.wikimedia.org, mailing lists hosted by the WMF, WMF Labs and Wikimedia technical infrastructure such as Phabricator as well as any in-person events sponsored or funded by the WMF. You accordingly may not participate in, edit, contribute, or otherwise modify any content on those sites, platforms, or lists. This ban is placed against your person, not against a particular username. It applies to any alternate accounts that you may control and any accounts you may create in the future. Furthermore, you may not participate as an anonymous user ('as an IP user')." We were invited to direct any questions and concerns about the ban to the Wikimedia Community Affairs and/or Legal teams at the Wikimedia Foundation. However, despite numerous attempts to e-mail and telephone personnel in those departments, they were entirely non-responsive. Thus, MyWikiBiz has concluded that the communication issued by Mr. Alexander was null and void; in other words, non-binding. | ||
| + | |||
| + | If you're reading this page, there's a good chance you already know ''exactly'' what we're talking about here. | ||
==Our advice== | ==Our advice== | ||
| Line 21: | Line 25: | ||
If you are thinking about publishing content on Wikipedia that you suspect may come under fire for "conflict of interest" reasons, you are advised to [[Directory:MyWikiBiz/Paid_editing#Contact_MyWikiBiz|contact MyWikiBiz]] for a free consulting discussion to obtain advice and possible assistance. | If you are thinking about publishing content on Wikipedia that you suspect may come under fire for "conflict of interest" reasons, you are advised to [[Directory:MyWikiBiz/Paid_editing#Contact_MyWikiBiz|contact MyWikiBiz]] for a free consulting discussion to obtain advice and possible assistance. | ||
| − | Despite a superficial "permanent ban" from Wikipedia, MyWikiBiz and its affiliates (all under signed non-disclosure agreements) have researched, written, and published on Wikipedia numerous paid articles, | + | Despite a superficial "permanent ban" from Wikipedia, MyWikiBiz (in the early years) and its affiliates (more recently, and all under signed non-disclosure agreements) have researched, written, and published on Wikipedia numerous paid articles, from 2007 to the present day. A very few vindictive administrators on Wikipedia think they have the power to thusly censor free content that meets all the terms and conditions of the site owners, but in practice they actually have no real powers of this sort. Every day, paid consultants are facilitating the addition of freely-licensed information to community-sourced projects like Wikipedia, entrusting to the community to provide the give-and-take "balance" to any questionable perspectives. Some consultants have success using ''sockpuppet'' editor accounts that are dedicated to only one client before being phased out, or by using cycled IP addresses, public Wi-Fi hotspots, and mobile Internet connections. In this way, Wikipedia articles can be written in exchange for payment, then published as a courtesy, without retribution -- even despite a community "advisory" against editing Wikipedia in this fashion. Some consultants are successful, while many are not. But, it '''can''' be done, folks. You simply shouldn't ever breathe a word of it, especially if you've been successful. That's the secret to our success. If you or your company has a problem with Wikipedia, you can publicly announce that problem (and in most cases magnify it), or you can work according to Wikipedia's own policies about anonymity, get consultative support from outside Wikipedia, and modify content on Wikipedia in a voluntary fashion. If you then decide to "go public" about your interaction with consultants and Wikipedia, then be prepared to [https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/296187 see your Wikipedia article disappear] in a matter of days, as happened to the Wikipedia article about Foundr. |
| + | |||
| + | Approximately 85% of our client-related work has been successfully published to Wikipedia, while following terms of service and community guidelines related to anonymity. You likely won't achieve such a success rate by publicly disclosing all of your wants and needs related to Wikipedia. Private conversations are better. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Most consulting projects for MyWikiBiz clients are executed for about $200 to $350 dollars. If your work is handed off to another consulting firm, then higher rates certainly may be expected. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Why businesses pay for Wikipedia content== | ||
| + | |||
| + | From the [http://archive.is/TmW2F Examiner article] about this subject... | ||
| − | + | <blockquote>''As a globally-leading website that appears at or near the top of the most important search engine query results pages, Wikipedia has (for better or for worse) become a must-watch reference page. This is especially true for any business concerned about its brand awareness and a factual presentment of its corporate history and product or service descriptions. A company that can't be found on Wikipedia is deemed by most Internet researchers as "small potatoes" or "insignificant". Yet on the other hand, a company that is given a disproportionately negative and unfair treatment by Wikipedia is suffering immeasurable damage to its reputation. Businesses that understand the importance of content on Wikipedia, but don't have the time or prowess to engage directly in the topsy-turvy editing process have been hiring experienced editors to act on their behalf, since at least 2006.''</blockquote> | |
==Still curious?== | ==Still curious?== | ||
| − | [[Image:Preview teaser image.jpg|thumb|300px|right]]'''[[Directory:Your Business and Wikipedia|Your Business and Wikipedia]]''' is | + | [[Image:Preview teaser image.jpg|thumb|300px|right]]'''[[Directory:Your Business and Wikipedia|Your Business and Wikipedia]]''' is an e-book draft that may one day be published by [[Directory:Gregory J. Kohs|Gregory Kohs]]. With over a decade of experience as a [[Wikipedia]] editor, news maker, and spokesman, Kohs understands the ins and outs of creating, modifying, and manipulating Wikipedia content to better serve the needs of your business. This e-book shares his astounding and provocative secrets with you. |
===About the author=== | ===About the author=== | ||
| − | Gregory Kohs is a marketing research director for a Fortune 100 media company. His enterprise, [[Directory:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]], has been the subject of [http:// | + | Gregory Kohs is a marketing research director for a Fortune 100 media company. His enterprise, [[Directory:MyWikiBiz|MyWikiBiz]], has been the subject of [http://www.bing.com/news/search?q=mywikibiz&go=Submit&qs=n&form=QBNT news stories] appearing in ''USA Today'', the ''Washington Post'', and ''MSNBC.com''. He has appeared on [http://g4tv.com/attackoftheshow/theloop/63519/The-Loop-Can-Wikipedia-Be-Trusted.html national television] on [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wsu-QGi-ZWY multiple occasions] and has presented "how to" information about Wikipedia to [http://mywikibiz.com/images/3/3d/AACP_Presentation_MyWikiBiz.ppt academic audiences]. His experience with MyWikiBiz and Wikipedia has been documented in [http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&q=mywikibiz numerous books] and [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=mywikibiz scholarly works]. Having provided hired consulting to dozens of clients working on content within Wikipedia, Kohs is perfectly suited to teach you about your business and Wikipedia. |
==Contact MyWikiBiz== | ==Contact MyWikiBiz== | ||
| Line 58: | Line 70: | ||
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zale_Corporation&oldid=76232040 Zale Corporation] | * [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zale_Corporation&oldid=76232040 Zale Corporation] | ||
| − | Together, these pages are viewed | + | Together, these pages are viewed thousands of times by thousands of different Wikipedia readers every month. |
<br> | <br> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:30, 19 July 2017
Launched in 2006, the MyWikiBiz enterprise has authored dozens of encyclopedic articles about companies, products, and individual persons. These articles were published under terms of free, copyleft licenses, in hopes that free-content sites (primarily Wikipedia) would disseminate them to vast audiences for wider use. MyWikiBiz has not directly edited Wikipedia in exchange for payment, though, for a number of years. Its founder, Gregory Kohs, is available to consult businesses and individuals who have questions about how to best engage with Wikipedia and other free-content sites.
Evolution of the editing service
From August until October 2006, MyWikiBiz created content for about 10 articles that found their way to Wikipedia. Three of them were disclosed to the "powers that be" at Wikipedia, which led to two of them being deleted, and the remaining one being savaged by Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales. In the pinnacle of hypocrisy, an administrator who acted as Wales' lap-dog later plagiarized the original MyWikiBiz content and attempted (unsuccessfully, as he was caught red-handed) to claim the content ab initio as his own.
What about the other seven articles that were not disclosed? All are beautifully residing to this day within Wikipedia, thoughtfully tended to by the editing community. After the success of these seven articles, MyWikiBiz then added many dozens more Wikipedia pages and improvements on behalf of clients. Only two or three articles have ever been overturned by the Wikipedia administrative community.
Therefore, we at MyWikiBiz have concluded that content decisions at Wikipedia are not at all about "the quality of the contribution", but rather, "the provenance of the contribution". If the editor is embedded in the community, their content generally stays; but if the editor is new and unfamiliar, their content will generally be deprecated or removed with prejudice.
As of June 16, 2014, the Wikimedia Foundation has implemented in its Terms of Use a new section entitled "Paid contributions without disclosure". The key aspect of this section is that users:
...must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.
Therefore, when you engage the services of MyWikiBiz, you are paying for the expertise of MyWikiBiz and its affiliate editors; that is, you are compensating us for our research skills, writing style, and editorial review time. Your payment also obtains our knowledge of policies and guidelines on Wikipedia and other Wikimedia Foundation projects. You agree that you are making no payment for any content contributions on Wikipedia or other Wikimedia Foundation projects. MyWikiBiz will only execute content contributions on Wikipedia or other Wikimedia Foundation projects through other editors-in-good-standing, as a personal courtesy at or near the end of our consultative project. MyWikiBiz may not receive or expect to receive any compensation for directly publishing or editing content on Wikipedia or other Wikimedia Foundation projects, and thus no refunds or rebates will be offered to you as the result of any content outcomes on Wikipedia or other Wikimedia Foundation projects which are ultimately outside of our control. Because of these service terms, MyWikiBiz and its affiliate editors are exempt from the Wikimedia Foundation Terms of Use section about "Paid contributions without disclosure". Since we neither receive nor expect to receive compensation for any of our contributions to Wikipedia or other Wikimedia Foundation projects, we need not make disclosure of our employer(s), client(s), or affiliation(s). So, when you engage in a consultation with MyWikiBiz, you are assured of privacy and confidentiality regarding your intentions (past, present, and future) regarding Wikipedia!
Further worthy of note is that a representative of the Wikimedia Foundation (James Alexander, 19 April 2017) contacted the founder of MyWikiBiz via e-mail to, "notify you that you are banned from all Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) websites, platforms and activities. This includes but is not limited to, any site listed at www.wikimedia.org, mailing lists hosted by the WMF, WMF Labs and Wikimedia technical infrastructure such as Phabricator as well as any in-person events sponsored or funded by the WMF. You accordingly may not participate in, edit, contribute, or otherwise modify any content on those sites, platforms, or lists. This ban is placed against your person, not against a particular username. It applies to any alternate accounts that you may control and any accounts you may create in the future. Furthermore, you may not participate as an anonymous user ('as an IP user')." We were invited to direct any questions and concerns about the ban to the Wikimedia Community Affairs and/or Legal teams at the Wikimedia Foundation. However, despite numerous attempts to e-mail and telephone personnel in those departments, they were entirely non-responsive. Thus, MyWikiBiz has concluded that the communication issued by Mr. Alexander was null and void; in other words, non-binding.
If you're reading this page, there's a good chance you already know exactly what we're talking about here.
Our advice
If you are thinking about publishing content on Wikipedia that you suspect may come under fire for "conflict of interest" reasons, you are advised to contact MyWikiBiz for a free consulting discussion to obtain advice and possible assistance.
Despite a superficial "permanent ban" from Wikipedia, MyWikiBiz (in the early years) and its affiliates (more recently, and all under signed non-disclosure agreements) have researched, written, and published on Wikipedia numerous paid articles, from 2007 to the present day. A very few vindictive administrators on Wikipedia think they have the power to thusly censor free content that meets all the terms and conditions of the site owners, but in practice they actually have no real powers of this sort. Every day, paid consultants are facilitating the addition of freely-licensed information to community-sourced projects like Wikipedia, entrusting to the community to provide the give-and-take "balance" to any questionable perspectives. Some consultants have success using sockpuppet editor accounts that are dedicated to only one client before being phased out, or by using cycled IP addresses, public Wi-Fi hotspots, and mobile Internet connections. In this way, Wikipedia articles can be written in exchange for payment, then published as a courtesy, without retribution -- even despite a community "advisory" against editing Wikipedia in this fashion. Some consultants are successful, while many are not. But, it can be done, folks. You simply shouldn't ever breathe a word of it, especially if you've been successful. That's the secret to our success. If you or your company has a problem with Wikipedia, you can publicly announce that problem (and in most cases magnify it), or you can work according to Wikipedia's own policies about anonymity, get consultative support from outside Wikipedia, and modify content on Wikipedia in a voluntary fashion. If you then decide to "go public" about your interaction with consultants and Wikipedia, then be prepared to see your Wikipedia article disappear in a matter of days, as happened to the Wikipedia article about Foundr.
Approximately 85% of our client-related work has been successfully published to Wikipedia, while following terms of service and community guidelines related to anonymity. You likely won't achieve such a success rate by publicly disclosing all of your wants and needs related to Wikipedia. Private conversations are better.
Most consulting projects for MyWikiBiz clients are executed for about $200 to $350 dollars. If your work is handed off to another consulting firm, then higher rates certainly may be expected.
Why businesses pay for Wikipedia content
From the Examiner article about this subject...
As a globally-leading website that appears at or near the top of the most important search engine query results pages, Wikipedia has (for better or for worse) become a must-watch reference page. This is especially true for any business concerned about its brand awareness and a factual presentment of its corporate history and product or service descriptions. A company that can't be found on Wikipedia is deemed by most Internet researchers as "small potatoes" or "insignificant". Yet on the other hand, a company that is given a disproportionately negative and unfair treatment by Wikipedia is suffering immeasurable damage to its reputation. Businesses that understand the importance of content on Wikipedia, but don't have the time or prowess to engage directly in the topsy-turvy editing process have been hiring experienced editors to act on their behalf, since at least 2006.
Still curious?
Your Business and Wikipedia is an e-book draft that may one day be published by Gregory Kohs. With over a decade of experience as a Wikipedia editor, news maker, and spokesman, Kohs understands the ins and outs of creating, modifying, and manipulating Wikipedia content to better serve the needs of your business. This e-book shares his astounding and provocative secrets with you.
About the author
Gregory Kohs is a marketing research director for a Fortune 100 media company. His enterprise, MyWikiBiz, has been the subject of news stories appearing in USA Today, the Washington Post, and MSNBC.com. He has appeared on national television on multiple occasions and has presented "how to" information about Wikipedia to academic audiences. His experience with MyWikiBiz and Wikipedia has been documented in numerous books and scholarly works. Having provided hired consulting to dozens of clients working on content within Wikipedia, Kohs is perfectly suited to teach you about your business and Wikipedia.
Contact MyWikiBiz
For a confidential discussion, contact:
- Email: ResearchBiz (at) gmail (dot) com
- Phone: (484) NEW-WIKI
Content portfolio
MyWikiBiz is pleased to share some of the wiki content we have generated over the years. However, far more articles (and better ones) than these are protected by a non-disclosure agreement, and thus cannot be shared here.
- Arch Coal
- Brandywine Springs
- Liz Cohen
- Alec Head
- Job sharing
- Line management
- Lippe-Weissenfeld
- Looking Glass Falls
- National Fuel Gas
- Omnibus (survey)
- Propositional function
- Robert Half International
- Spiraling
- Zale Corporation
Together, these pages are viewed thousands of times by thousands of different Wikipedia readers every month.
Wikipedia expert Wikipedia consultant Wikipedia editing Wikipedia editor Wikipedia biography writer Wikipedia bio Wikipedia corporate bio paid editor Wikipedia business public relations marketing research marketing research consultant Wikipedia consulting Editor for hire Your Business and Wikipedia business listing Kohs corporate directory Wikipedia organization wiki business corporation directory corporation listing Wikipedia business Wikipedia corporate mywikibiz Wikipedia spam Wikipedia page Wikipedia new article how to wiki business encyclopedia Wikipedia listing wiki listing wiki article Wikipedia article Wikipedia corporation corporate listing not on Wikipedia how to edit Wikipedia Wikipedia add Wikipedia entry Wikipedia submit Wikipedia editing Wikipedia edit Wikipedia create Wikipedia traffic Wikipedia advertising Wikipedia ad Wikipedia write Wikipedia start Wikipedia missing wiki biz mywikibiz.com Wikipedia public relations Wikipedia marketing Jimmy Wales Jimbo Wales Wikipedia PR Wikipedia SEO Wikipedia B2B Wikipedia SEM Gregory Kohs Greg Kohs paid editing fixing Wikipedia paid Wikipedia editor experienced Wikipedia editor Wikipedia editor for hire New page Wikipedia New Wikipedia article how to hire a wikipedia editor
