Line 9: |
Line 9: |
| Shortly afterwards, Undertow rejoined Wikipedia as User Law in September 2008 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=newusers&user=Law&page=&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=], making over five thousand edits by March 2009 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Law], nearly half of which were in mainspace, when he was proposed for adminship by 'GlassCobra'. | | Shortly afterwards, Undertow rejoined Wikipedia as User Law in September 2008 [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=newusers&user=Law&page=&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=], making over five thousand edits by March 2009 [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Law], nearly half of which were in mainspace, when he was proposed for adminship by 'GlassCobra'. |
| | | |
− | Some time in August 2009, an anonymous IP outed Law on Law's talk page. The talk-page history shows that two edits were oversighted on August 16, the page protected, and the anon blocked [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AArbitration_Committee%2FNoticeboard&diff=317567253&oldid=317565517]. The implication is that someone used oversight to hide that Law had violated an ArbCom ban and had gained adminship by lying to the community, and that other admins blocked the whistleblower and protected the page against further revelations. | + | Some time in August 2009, an anonymous IP outed Law on Law's talk page. The talk-page history shows that two edits were oversighted on August 16, the page protected, and the anon blocked [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AArbitration_Committee%2FNoticeboard&diff=317567253&oldid=317565517], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Audit_Subcommittee/Reports&oldid=318109833#Full_reports]. The implication is that someone used oversight to hide that Law had violated an ArbCom ban and had gained adminship by lying to the community, and that other admins blocked the whistleblower and protected the page against further revelations. |
| | | |
| On September 20 2009, Law unblocked user [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ChildofMidnight ChildofMidnight ], overturning an arbitration enforcement block which had been placed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sandstein Sandstein]. It is expressly forbidden to overturn ArbCom enforcement actions in that way. When challenged, Law was unapologetic. Somewhere around then, it was discovered that Law was a reincarnation of Undertow. | | On September 20 2009, Law unblocked user [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ChildofMidnight ChildofMidnight ], overturning an arbitration enforcement block which had been placed by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sandstein Sandstein]. It is expressly forbidden to overturn ArbCom enforcement actions in that way. When challenged, Law was unapologetic. Somewhere around then, it was discovered that Law was a reincarnation of Undertow. |
Line 19: |
Line 19: |
| * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MZMcBride MZMcBride] who participated in defending Law here against a claim that he was acting like a cowboy administrator[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=299528562] | | * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MZMcBride MZMcBride] who participated in defending Law here against a claim that he was acting like a cowboy administrator[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=299528562] |
| * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ched_Davis Ched Davis] "While I was on IRC, a few weeks ago, I learned that Law = the undertow. To be frank, I didn't really give it much thought since "the undertow" had come and gone before I ever started here. I assumed that anyone was entitled to WP:CLEANSTART[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&oldid=317832913#Statement_by_Ched_Davis]. | | * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ched_Davis Ched Davis] "While I was on IRC, a few weeks ago, I learned that Law = the undertow. To be frank, I didn't really give it much thought since "the undertow" had come and gone before I ever started here. I assumed that anyone was entitled to WP:CLEANSTART[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&oldid=317832913#Statement_by_Ched_Davis]. |
− | * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jayron32 Jayron32] | + | * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jayron32 Jayron32] "You can go ahead and add me to the "parties" section of this case if you choose. I knew that Law was the undertow. I supported him in his RFA knowing that. I am not ashamed or embarassed by that. --Jayron32 05:48, 2 October 2009 (UTC)" [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case&diff=prev&oldid=317425028] |
| + | * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Iridescent Iridescent] |
| + | The motion for their removal of administrator rights is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Motions&oldid=318091230#GlassCobra.2C_Jayron32_and_Jennavecia_desysopped here]. |
| | | |
| ==Community reaction== | | ==Community reaction== |