| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | <pre>
| + | {{DISPLAYTITLE:Factorization Issues}} |
| − | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
| | | | |
| − | Factorization Issues
| + | ==Note 1== |
| − | | |
| − | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
| − | | |
| − | Note 1 | |
| − | | |
| − | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
| | | | |
| | + | <pre> |
| | | Things are equivocally named, when they have the name only in common, | | | Things are equivocally named, when they have the name only in common, |
| | | the definition (or statement of essence) corresponding with the name | | | the definition (or statement of essence) corresponding with the name |
| Line 23: |
Line 17: |
| | | Translated by H.P. Cooke & H. Tredennick, Loeb Classics, | | | Translated by H.P. Cooke & H. Tredennick, Loeb Classics, |
| | | William Heinemann Ltd, London, UK, 1938. | | | William Heinemann Ltd, London, UK, 1938. |
| − |
| |
| − | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
| | | | |
| | I would like to introduce a concept that I find to be of | | I would like to introduce a concept that I find to be of |
| Line 307: |
Line 299: |
| | and this is the topic that | | and this is the topic that |
| | I will take up next. | | I will take up next. |
| | + | </pre> |
| | | | |
| − | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | ==Note 2== |
| − | | |
| − | Note 2 | |
| − | | |
| − | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
| | | | |
| | + | <pre> |
| | Let me illustrate what I think that a lot of our controversies | | Let me illustrate what I think that a lot of our controversies |
| | about nominalism versus realism actually boil down to in practice. | | about nominalism versus realism actually boil down to in practice. |
| Line 496: |
Line 486: |
| | Okay, there are a few pieces of this that I | | Okay, there are a few pieces of this that I |
| | will need to think over once or thrice more. | | will need to think over once or thrice more. |
| | + | </pre> |
| | | | |
| − | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | ==Note 3== |
| − | | |
| − | Note 3 | |
| − | | |
| − | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
| | | | |
| | + | <pre> |
| | JA = Jon Awbrey | | JA = Jon Awbrey |
| | SR = Seth Russell | | SR = Seth Russell |
| Line 559: |
Line 547: |
| | I forget now, but I don't remember saying anything yet | | I forget now, but I don't remember saying anything yet |
| | about interpretants in this example. I will go check. | | about interpretants in this example. I will go check. |
| | + | </pre> |
| | | | |
| − | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | ==Note 4== |
| − | | |
| − | Note 4 | |
| − | | |
| − | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
| | | | |
| | + | <pre> |
| | JA = Jon Awbrey | | JA = Jon Awbrey |
| | SR = Seth Russell | | SR = Seth Russell |
| Line 902: |
Line 888: |
| | | | |
| | SR: ... thanks for the dialogue. | | SR: ... thanks for the dialogue. |
| | + | </pre> |
| | | | |
| − | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | ==Note 5== |
| − | | |
| − | Note 5 | |
| − | | |
| − | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
| | | | |
| | + | <pre> |
| | JA = Jon Awbrey | | JA = Jon Awbrey |
| | SR = Seth Russell | | SR = Seth Russell |
| Line 1,012: |
Line 996: |
| | So, in general, it can happen that a use of the string of char "Cat" | | So, in general, it can happen that a use of the string of char "Cat" |
| | may denote a particular cat, a category of cats, or a catitudiosity. | | may denote a particular cat, a category of cats, or a catitudiosity. |
| | + | </pre> |
| | | | |
| − | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | ==Work Area== |
| − | | |
| − | Note ???
| |
| − | | |
| − | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
| − | | |
| − | Note ???
| |
| − | | |
| − | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
| | | | |
| | + | <pre> |
| | The word "intension" has recently come to be stressed in our discussions. | | The word "intension" has recently come to be stressed in our discussions. |
| | As I first learned this word from my reading of Leibniz, I shall take it | | As I first learned this word from my reading of Leibniz, I shall take it |
| Line 1,058: |
Line 1,032: |
| | analogous to the issue of where to place those other i-words, namely, "idea", | | analogous to the issue of where to place those other i-words, namely, "idea", |
| | capitalized or not, "impresssion", "intelligible concept", and "interpretant". | | capitalized or not, "impresssion", "intelligible concept", and "interpretant". |
| | + | </pre> |
| | | | |
| − | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| + | ==Document History== |
| − | | |
| − | Factorization Issues
| |
| | | | |
| − | Standard Upper Ontology (Nov 2000) | + | ===Standard Upper Ontology (Nov 2000)=== |
| | | | |
| | * http://suo.ieee.org/email/thrd224.html#02332 | | * http://suo.ieee.org/email/thrd224.html#02332 |
| Line 1,075: |
Line 1,048: |
| | # http://suo.ieee.org/email/msg02448.html | | # http://suo.ieee.org/email/msg02448.html |
| | | | |
| − | Standard Upper Ontology (Nov 2001) | + | ===Standard Upper Ontology (Nov 2001)=== |
| | | | |
| | * http://suo.ieee.org/email/thrd128.html#07143 | | * http://suo.ieee.org/email/thrd128.html#07143 |
| Line 1,083: |
Line 1,056: |
| | # http://suo.ieee.org/email/msg07185.html | | # http://suo.ieee.org/email/msg07185.html |
| | # http://suo.ieee.org/email/msg07186.html | | # http://suo.ieee.org/email/msg07186.html |
| − |
| |
| − | o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o
| |
| − | </pre>
| |