Difference between revisions of "Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Peter Damian Evidence"

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Wednesday November 27, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
 
=== Mathematics, logic and set theory ===
 
=== Mathematics, logic and set theory ===
  
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zermelo_set_theory] Viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Zermelo_set_theory 662] times in February 2008.
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zermelo_set_theory Zermelo set theory] Viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Zermelo_set_theory 662] times in February 2008.
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skolem%27s_paradox]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skolem%27s_paradox Skolem's paradox]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hume%27s_principle]  Viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Hume%27s_principle 1012] times in February 2008.
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hume%27s_principle Hume's_principle]  Viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Hume%27s_principle 1012] times in February 2008.
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definitions_of_Logic]
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definitions_of_Logic Definitions of Logic]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_form]  Viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Logical_form 450] times in February 2008.
+
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_form Logical form]  Viewed [http://stats.grok.se/en/200802/Logical_form 450] times in February 2008.
  
 
=== Philosophical Logic ===
 
=== Philosophical Logic ===

Revision as of 07:18, 19 September 2008

Evidence for the Arbitration Committee

The Arbitration Committee (September 2008)

Peter Damian Background

Work in progress

Mathematics, logic and set theory

Philosophical Logic

I suppose I should mention [Philosophy (138105 in February 2008) as I did put some time into it, but it really has got f--ked up now. The current breed of admins are good at picking up minor schoolboy vandalism but are incapable of spotting anything that requires expert knowledge. That is the problem with Wikipedia isn't it. edward 16:11, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Medieval philosophy and logic

Classical Philosophy


Biographies

Gospel music

Argument

  • There is an important difference between principled and good-faith criticism of a contributor, and personal attack or harassment.
  • My criticism of the editor called FT2 has been principled and in good faith. Should not therefore be labelled as 'harassment'.

To justify this I will need to explain exactly why I have a problem with FT2's contributions to the Wikipedia project.

Blocks of Peter Damian

Relevant accounts

Blocks

Damian blocks Renamed user 4 blocks

  • 4 December 2007 Radiant! (Smear campaign)
  • 6 December 2007 WJBscribe (legal threat)
  • 29 June 2008 Ryan Postlethwaite (Harassment)
  • 13 August 2008 (MBiszanz - personal attack or harassment)
  • 01:45, 31 August 2008 bu Coren (incivility)
  • 23:11, 6 September 2008 by Jimbo Wales (harassment)

Criticism of FT2