Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Sunday November 24, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:     
"Admin FCYTravis has just deleted the article Historical pederastic couples, in spite of the fact that it just survived an AFd. I find this action unusual, to say the least, ands would like input from other admins and the community as a whole. One person's distaste for an article must not take precedent over a sourced article and lack of consensus, which was divided 60/40. Jeffpw (talk) 20:23, 19 July 2008 (UTC)"
 
"Admin FCYTravis has just deleted the article Historical pederastic couples, in spite of the fact that it just survived an AFd. I find this action unusual, to say the least, ands would like input from other admins and the community as a whole. One person's distaste for an article must not take precedent over a sourced article and lack of consensus, which was divided 60/40. Jeffpw (talk) 20:23, 19 July 2008 (UTC)"
 +
 +
The need to attack other editors at the same time.
 +
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=226870434], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=prev&oldid=226865920]
 +
* Pro-pederasty collaboration (canvassing?) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Haiduc&diff=prev&oldid=226828851]
 +
* upset about not getting the requisite pro pederasty editor support? [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Historical_pederastic_couples&diff=prev&oldid=226828539]
 +
* rather one-sided view of libel (pro pederast side) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=226824572]
 +
* Very upset [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_LGBT_studies&diff=prev&oldid=226823929]
 +
* Denial of significant views [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=226795815]
 +
 +
Just a cursory look at the literature shows a significant view that Shively is a NAMBLA advocate man/boy love advocate heckled at cornell Gay Community News. Boston: May 12, 1984. Vol. 11, Iss. 42; pg. 2
 +
 +
“NAMBLA also co-sponsored Shively's visit”
 +
 +
They must be conservative, and the yuk brigade, therefore unworthy? [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=226823790]
 +
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2008_July_20&diff=prev&oldid=226822843]
 +
looking for blood [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=226772253]
3,209

edits

Navigation menu