Changes

241 bytes added ,  14:55, 30 January 2008
JPEG buffer overflow attacks
Line 157: Line 157:  
: Thanks.  Although it ''does'' appear to sort when you query ''only'' those philosophers who have ccmp (i.e. use the + option)  Since every philosopher will by definition have a rating (0 if they are not mentioned at all) probably doesn't make sense to use set number of digits (unless you recommend otherwise).  [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 08:59, 28 January 2008 (PST)
 
: Thanks.  Although it ''does'' appear to sort when you query ''only'' those philosophers who have ccmp (i.e. use the + option)  Since every philosopher will by definition have a rating (0 if they are not mentioned at all) probably doesn't make sense to use set number of digits (unless you recommend otherwise).  [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 08:59, 28 January 2008 (PST)
 
:: [update] yes, once I populate all the ccmp values it updates correctly.  Obviously having null values makes it default to string sort or something like that. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 09:06, 28 January 2008 (PST)
 
:: [update] yes, once I populate all the ccmp values it updates correctly.  Obviously having null values makes it default to string sort or something like that. [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 09:06, 28 January 2008 (PST)
 +
 +
== JPEG buffer overflow attacks ==
 +
 +
Hi Greg.  Could you tell DL to look at this? <br />
 +
[http://secunia.com/advisories/12528/ Secunia Advisory: Microsoft Multiple Products JPEG Processing Buffer Overflow Vulnerability]
 +
 +
Thanks, <br />
 +
AB
13

edits