Line 2,244: |
Line 2,244: |
| ===Commentary Note 11.3=== | | ===Commentary Note 11.3=== |
| | | |
− | <pre>
| + | Having spent a fair amount of time in earnest reflection on the issue, I cannot see a way to continue my interpretation of Peirce's 1870 LOR, to master the distance between his conventions of presentation and my present personal perspectives on relations, without introducing a few interpretive anachronisms and other artifacts in the process, and the only excuse that I can make for myself is that at least these will be novel sorts of anachronisms and artifacts in comparison with the ones that the reeder may alreedy have seen. A poor excuse, but all I have. The least that I can do, then, and I'm something of an expert on that, is to exposit my personal interpretive apparatus on a separate thread, where it will not distract too much from the intellectual canon, that is to opine, the "thinking panpipe" that we find in Peirce's 1870 LOR. |
− | Having spent a fair amount of time in earnest reflection on the issue, | |
− | I cannot see a way to continue my interpretation of Peirce's 1870 LOR, | |
− | to master the distance between his conventions of presentation and my | |
− | present personal perspectives on relations, without introducing a few | |
− | interpretive anachronisms and other artifacts in the process, and the | |
− | only excuse that I can make for myself is that at least these will be | |
− | novel sorts of anachronisms and artifacts in comparison with the ones | |
− | that the reeder may alreedy have seen. A poor excuse, but all I have. | |
− | The least that I can do, then, and I'm something of an expert on that, | |
− | is to exposit my personal interpretive apparatus on a separate thread, | |
− | where it will not distract too much from the intellectual canon, that | |
− | is to opine, the "thinking panpipe" that we find in Peirce's 1870 LOR. | |
| | | |
− | Ripped from the pages of my dissertation, then, I will lay out | + | Ripped from the pages of my dissertation, then, I will lay out some samples of background material on "Relations In General", as spied from a combinatorial point of view, that I hope will serve in reeding Peirce's text, if we draw on it judiciously. |
− | some samples of background material on "Relations In General", | |
− | as spied from a combinatorial point of view, that I hope will | |
− | serve in reeding Peirce's text, if we draw on it judiciously. | |
− | </pre>
| |
| | | |
| ===Commentary Note 11.4=== | | ===Commentary Note 11.4=== |