Changes

<font size="3">&#9758;</font> This page belongs to resource collections on [[Logic Live|Logic]] and [[Inquiry Live|Inquiry]].

<font size="3">&#9758;</font> This page belongs to resource collections on [[Logic Live|Logic]] and [[Inquiry Live|Inquiry]].

A '''minimal negation operator''' <math>(\texttt{Mno})\!</math> is a logical connective that says &ldquo;just one false&rdquo; of its logical arguments.  

A '''minimal negation operator''' <math>(\nu)~\!</math> is a logical connective that says &ldquo;just one false&rdquo; of its logical arguments.  

If the list of arguments is empty, as expressed in the form <math>\texttt{Mno}(),\!</math> then it cannot be true that exactly one of the arguments is false, so <math>\texttt{Mno}() = \texttt{False}.\!</math>

* If the list of arguments is empty, as expressed in the form <math>\nu(),~\!</math> then it cannot be true that exactly one of the arguments is false, so <math>\nu() = \mathrm{false}.~\!</math>

If <math>p\!</math> is the only argument, then <math>\texttt{Mno}(p)\!</math> says that <math>p\!</math> is false, so <math>\texttt{Mno}(p)\!</math> expresses the logical negation of the proposition <math>p.\!</math>  Wrtten in several different notations, <math>\texttt{Mno}(p) = \texttt{Not}(p) = \lnot p = \tilde{p} = p^\prime.\!</math>

* If <math>p~\!</math> is the only argument, then <math>\nu(p)~\!</math> says that <math>p~\!</math> is false, so <math>\nu(p)~\!</math> expresses the logical negation of the proposition <math>p.~\!</math>  Written in several different notations, <math>\nu(p) = \mathrm{not}(p) = \lnot p = \tilde{p} = p^\prime.~\!</math>

If <math>p\!</math> and <math>q\!</math> are the only two arguments, then <math>\texttt{Mno}(p, q)\!</math> says that exactly one of <math>p, q\!</math> is false, so <math>\texttt{Mno}(p, q)\!</math> says the same thing as <math>p \neq q.\!</math>  Expressing <math>\texttt{Mno}(p, q)\!</math> in terms of ands <math>(\cdot),\!</math> ors <math>(\lor),\!</math> and nots <math>(\tilde{~})\!</math> gives the following form.

* If <math>p~\!</math> and <math>q~\!</math> are the only two arguments, then <math>\nu(p, q)~\!</math> says that exactly one of <math>p, q~\!</math> is false, so <math>\nu(p, q)~\!</math> says the same thing as <math>p \neq q.~\!</math>  Expressing <math>\nu(p, q)~\!</math> in terms of ands <math>(\cdot),~\!</math> ors <math>(\lor),~\!</math> and nots <math>(\tilde{~})~\!</math> gives the following form.

{| align="center" cellpadding="8"

{| align="center" cellpadding="8"

| <math>\texttt{Mno}(p, q) = \tilde{p} \cdot q ~\lor~ p \cdot \tilde{q}.\!</math>

| <math>\nu(p, q) = \tilde{p} \cdot q ~\lor~ p \cdot \tilde{q}.~\!</math>

|}

|}

{| align="center" cellpadding="8"

{| align="center" cellpadding="8"

| <math>\texttt{Mno}(p, q) = \tilde{p}q \lor p\tilde{q}.\!</math>

| <math>\nu(p, q) = \tilde{p}q \lor p\tilde{q}.~\!</math>

|}

|}

The venn diagram for <math>\texttt{Mno}(p, q)\!</math> is shown in Figure&nbsp;1.

The venn diagram for <math>\nu(p, q)~\!</math> is shown in Figure&nbsp;1.

{| align="center" cellpadding="8" style="text-align:center"

{| align="center" cellpadding="8" style="text-align:center"

|

|

<p>[[Image:Venn Diagram (P,Q).jpg|500px]]</p>

<p>[[Image:Venn Diagram (P,Q).jpg|500px]]</p>

<p><math>\text{Figure 1.}~~\texttt{Mno}(p, q)\!</math></p>

<p><math>\text{Figure 1.}~~\nu(p, q)~\!</math></p>

|}

|}

The venn diagram for <math>\texttt{Mno}(p, q, r)\!</math> is shown in Figure&nbsp;2.

The venn diagram for <math>\nu(p, q, r)~\!</math> is shown in Figure&nbsp;2.

{| align="center" cellpadding="8" style="text-align:center"

{| align="center" cellpadding="8" style="text-align:center"

|

|

<p>[[Image:Venn Diagram (P,Q,R).jpg|500px]]</p>

<p>[[Image:Venn Diagram (P,Q,R).jpg|500px]]</p>

<p><math>\text{Figure 2.}~~\texttt{Mno}(p, q, r)\!</math></p>

<p><math>\text{Figure 2.}~~\nu(p, q, r)~\!</math></p>

|}

|}

The center cell is the region where all three arguments <math>p, q, r\!</math> hold true, so <math>\texttt{Mno}(p, q, r)\!</math> holds true in just the three neighboring cells.  In other words, <math>\texttt{Mno}(p, q, r) = \tilde{p}qr \lor p\tilde{q}r \lor pq\tilde{r}.\!</math>

The center cell is the region where all three arguments <math>p, q, r~\!</math> hold true, so <math>\nu(p, q, r)~\!</math> holds true in just the three neighboring cells.  In other words, <math>\nu(p, q, r) = \tilde{p}qr \lor p\tilde{q}r \lor pq\tilde{r}.~\!</math>

==Initial definition==

==Initial definition==

The '''minimal negation operator''' <math>\nu\!</math> is a [[multigrade operator]] <math>(\nu_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}}\!</math> where each <math>\nu_k\!</math> is a <math>k\!</math>-ary [[boolean function]] defined in such a way that <math>\nu_k (x_1, \ldots , x_k) = 1\!</math> in just those cases where exactly one of the arguments <math>x_j\!</math> is <math>0.\!</math>

The '''minimal negation operator''' <math>\nu~\!</math> is a [[multigrade operator]] <math>(\nu_k)_{k \in \mathbb{N}}~\!</math> where each <math>\nu_k~\!</math> is a <math>k~\!</math>-ary [[boolean function]] defined in such a way that <math>\nu_k (x_1, \ldots , x_k) = 1~\!</math> in just those cases where exactly one of the arguments <math>x_j~\!</math> is <math>0.~\!</math>

In contexts where the initial letter <math>\nu\!</math> is understood, the minimal negation operators can be indicated by argument lists in parentheses.  In the following text a distinctive typeface will be used for logical expressions based on minimal negation operators, for example, <math>\texttt{(x, y, z)}\!</math> = <math>\nu (x, y, z).\!</math>

In contexts where the initial letter <math>\nu~\!</math> is understood, the minimal negation operators can be indicated by argument lists in parentheses.  In the following text a distinctive typeface will be used for logical expressions based on minimal negation operators, for example, <math>\texttt{(x, y, z)}~\!</math> = <math>\nu (x, y, z).~\!</math>

The first four members of this family of operators are shown below, with paraphrases in a couple of other notations, where tildes and primes, respectively, indicate logical negation.

The first four members of this family of operators are shown below, with paraphrases in a couple of other notations, where tildes and primes, respectively, indicate logical negation.

==Formal definition==

==Formal definition==

To express the general case of <math>\nu_k\!</math> in terms of familiar operations, it helps to introduce an intermediary concept:

To express the general case of <math>\nu_k~\!</math> in terms of familiar operations, it helps to introduce an intermediary concept:

'''Definition.'''  Let the function <math>\lnot_j : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B}\!</math> be defined for each integer <math>j\!</math> in the interval <math>[1, k]\!</math> by the following equation:

'''Definition.'''  Let the function <math>\lnot_j : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B}~\!</math> be defined for each integer <math>j~\!</math> in the interval <math>[1, k]~\!</math> by the following equation:

{| align="center" cellpadding="8"

{| align="center" cellpadding="8"

| <math>\lnot_j (x_1, \ldots, x_j, \ldots, x_k) ~=~ x_1 \land \ldots \land x_{j-1} \land \lnot x_j \land x_{j+1} \land \ldots \land x_k.\!</math>

| <math>\lnot_j (x_1, \ldots, x_j, \ldots, x_k) ~=~ x_1 \land \ldots \land x_{j-1} \land \lnot x_j \land x_{j+1} \land \ldots \land x_k.~\!</math>

|}

|}

Then <math>{\nu_k : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B}}\!</math> is defined by the following equation:

Then <math>{\nu_k : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B}}~\!</math> is defined by the following equation:

{| align="center" cellpadding="8"

{| align="center" cellpadding="8"

| <math>\nu_k (x_1, \ldots, x_k) ~=~ \lnot_1 (x_1, \ldots, x_k) \lor \ldots \lor \lnot_j (x_1, \ldots, x_k) \lor \ldots \lor \lnot_k (x_1, \ldots, x_k).\!</math>

| <math>\nu_k (x_1, \ldots, x_k) ~=~ \lnot_1 (x_1, \ldots, x_k) \lor \ldots \lor \lnot_j (x_1, \ldots, x_k) \lor \ldots \lor \lnot_k (x_1, \ldots, x_k).~\!</math>

|}

|}

If we think of the point <math>x = (x_1, \ldots, x_k) \in \mathbb{B}^k\!</math> as indicated by the boolean product <math>x_1 \cdot \ldots \cdot x_k\!</math> or the logical conjunction <math>x_1 \land \ldots \land x_k,\!</math> then the minimal negation <math>\texttt{(} x_1, \ldots, x_k \texttt{)}\!</math> indicates the set of points in <math>\mathbb{B}^k\!</math> that differ from <math>x\!</math> in exactly one coordinate.  This makes <math>\texttt{(} x_1, \ldots, x_k \texttt{)}\!</math> a discrete functional analogue of a ''point omitted neighborhood'' in analysis, more exactly, a ''point omitted distance one neighborhood''.  In this light, the minimal negation operator can be recognized as a differential construction, an observation that opens a very wide field.  It also serves to explain a variety of other names for the same concept, for example, ''logical boundary operator'', ''limen operator'', ''least action operator'', or ''hedge operator'', to name but a few.  The rationale for these names is visible in the venn diagrams of the corresponding operations on sets.

If we think of the point <math>x = (x_1, \ldots, x_k) \in \mathbb{B}^k~\!</math> as indicated by the boolean product <math>x_1 \cdot \ldots \cdot x_k~\!</math> or the logical conjunction <math>x_1 \land \ldots \land x_k,~\!</math> then the minimal negation <math>\texttt{(} x_1, \ldots, x_k \texttt{)}~\!</math> indicates the set of points in <math>\mathbb{B}^k~\!</math> that differ from <math>x~\!</math> in exactly one coordinate.  This makes <math>\texttt{(} x_1, \ldots, x_k \texttt{)}~\!</math> a discrete functional analogue of a ''point omitted neighborhood'' in analysis, more exactly, a ''point omitted distance one neighborhood''.  In this light, the minimal negation operator can be recognized as a differential construction, an observation that opens a very wide field.  It also serves to explain a variety of other names for the same concept, for example, ''logical boundary operator'', ''limen operator'', ''least action operator'', or ''hedge operator'', to name but a few.  The rationale for these names is visible in the venn diagrams of the corresponding operations on sets.

The remainder of this discussion proceeds on the ''algebraic boolean convention'' that the plus sign <math>(+)\!</math> and the summation symbol <math>(\textstyle\sum)\!</math> both refer to addition modulo 2.  Unless otherwise noted, the boolean domain <math>\mathbb{B} = \{ 0, 1 \}~\!</math> is interpreted so that <math>0 = \mathrm{false}\!</math> and <math>1 = \mathrm{true}.\!</math>  This has the following consequences:

The remainder of this discussion proceeds on the ''algebraic boolean convention'' that the plus sign <math>(+)~\!</math> and the summation symbol <math>(\textstyle\sum)~\!</math> both refer to addition modulo 2.  Unless otherwise noted, the boolean domain <math>\mathbb{B} = \{ 0, 1 \}~\!</math> is interpreted so that <math>0 = \mathrm{false}~\!</math> and <math>1 = \mathrm{true}.~\!</math>  This has the following consequences:

{| align="center" cellpadding="4" width="90%"

{| align="center" cellpadding="4" width="90%"

| valign="top" | <big>&bull;</big>

| valign="top" | <big>&bull;</big>

| The operation <math>x + y\!</math> is a function equivalent to the exclusive disjunction of <math>x\!</math> and <math>y,\!</math> while its fiber of 1 is the relation of inequality between <math>x\!</math> and <math>y.\!</math>

| The operation <math>x + y~\!</math> is a function equivalent to the exclusive disjunction of <math>x~\!</math> and <math>y,~\!</math> while its fiber of 1 is the relation of inequality between <math>x~\!</math> and <math>y.~\!</math>

|-

|-

| valign="top" | <big>&bull;</big>

| valign="top" | <big>&bull;</big>

| The operation <math>\textstyle\sum_{j=1}^k x_j\!</math> maps the bit sequence <math>(x_1, \ldots, x_k)\!</math> to its ''parity''.

| The operation <math>\textstyle\sum_{j=1}^k x_j~\!</math> maps the bit sequence <math>(x_1, \ldots, x_k)~\!</math> to its ''parity''.

|}

|}

The following properties of the minimal negation operators <math>{\nu_k : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B}}\!</math> may be noted:

The following properties of the minimal negation operators <math>{\nu_k : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B}}~\!</math> may be noted:

{| align="center" cellpadding="4" width="90%"

{| align="center" cellpadding="4" width="90%"

| valign="top" | <big>&bull;</big>

| valign="top" | <big>&bull;</big>

| The function <math>\texttt{(x, y)}\!</math> is the same as that associated with the operation <math>x + y\!</math> and the relation <math>x \ne y.\!</math>

| The function <math>\texttt{(x, y)}~\!</math> is the same as that associated with the operation <math>x + y~\!</math> and the relation <math>x \ne y.~\!</math>

|-

|-

| valign="top" | <big>&bull;</big>

| valign="top" | <big>&bull;</big>

| In contrast, <math>\texttt{(x, y, z)}\!</math> is not identical to <math>x + y + z.\!</math>

| In contrast, <math>\texttt{(x, y, z)}~\!</math> is not identical to <math>x + y + z.~\!</math>

|-

|-

| valign="top" | <big>&bull;</big>

| valign="top" | <big>&bull;</big>

| More generally, the function <math>\nu_k (x_1, \dots, x_k)\!</math> for <math>k > 2\!</math> is not identical to the boolean sum <math>\textstyle\sum_{j=1}^k x_j.\!</math>

| More generally, the function <math>\nu_k (x_1, \dots, x_k)~\!</math> for <math>k > 2~\!</math> is not identical to the boolean sum <math>\textstyle\sum_{j=1}^k x_j.~\!</math>

|-

|-

| valign="top" | <big>&bull;</big>

| valign="top" | <big>&bull;</big>

| The inclusive disjunctions indicated for the <math>\nu_k\!</math> of more than one argument may be replaced with exclusive disjunctions without affecting the meaning, since the terms disjoined are already disjoint.

| The inclusive disjunctions indicated for the <math>\nu_k~\!</math> of more than one argument may be replaced with exclusive disjunctions without affecting the meaning, since the terms disjoined are already disjoint.

|}

|}

==Truth tables==

==Truth tables==

Table&nbsp;3 is a [[truth table]] for the sixteen boolean functions of type <math>f : \mathbb{B}^3 \to \mathbb{B}\!</math> whose fibers of 1 are either the boundaries of points in <math>\mathbb{B}^3\!</math> or the complements of those boundaries.

Table&nbsp;3 is a [[truth table]] for the sixteen boolean functions of type <math>f : \mathbb{B}^3 \to \mathbb{B}~\!</math> whose fibers of 1 are either the boundaries of points in <math>\mathbb{B}^3~\!</math> or the complements of those boundaries.

<br>

<br>

{| align="center" border="1" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" style="text-align:center; width:70%"

{| align="center" border="1" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" style="text-align:center; width:70%"

|+ <math>\text{Table 3.} ~~ \text{Logical Boundaries and Their Complements}\!</math>

|+ <math>\text{Table 3.} ~~ \text{Logical Boundaries and Their Complements}~\!</math>

|- style="background:ghostwhite"

|- style="background:ghostwhite"

| <math>\mathcal{L}_1\!</math>

| <math>\mathcal{L}_1~\!</math>

| <math>\mathcal{L}_2\!</math>

| <math>\mathcal{L}_2~\!</math>

| <math>\mathcal{L}_3\!</math>

| <math>\mathcal{L}_3~\!</math>

| <math>\mathcal{L}_4\!</math>

| <math>\mathcal{L}_4~\!</math>

|- style="background:ghostwhite"

|- style="background:ghostwhite"

| &nbsp;

| &nbsp;

| align="right" | <math>p\colon\!</math>

| align="right" | <math>p\colon~\!</math>

| <math>1~1~1~1~0~0~0~0\!</math>

| <math>1~1~1~1~0~0~0~0~\!</math>

| &nbsp;

| &nbsp;

|- style="background:ghostwhite"

|- style="background:ghostwhite"

| &nbsp;

| &nbsp;

| align="right" | <math>q\colon\!</math>

| align="right" | <math>q\colon~\!</math>

| <math>1~1~0~0~1~1~0~0\!</math>

| <math>1~1~0~0~1~1~0~0~\!</math>

| &nbsp;

| &nbsp;

|- style="background:ghostwhite"

|- style="background:ghostwhite"

| &nbsp;

| &nbsp;

| align="right" | <math>r\colon\!</math>

| align="right" | <math>r\colon~\!</math>

| <math>1~0~1~0~1~0~1~0\!</math>

| <math>1~0~1~0~1~0~1~0~\!</math>

| &nbsp;

| &nbsp;

|-

|-

This Section focuses on visual representations of minimal negation operators.  A few bits of terminology are useful in describing the pictures, but the formal details are tedious reading, and may be familiar to many readers, so the full definitions of the terms marked in ''italics'' are relegated to a Glossary at the end of the article.

This Section focuses on visual representations of minimal negation operators.  A few bits of terminology are useful in describing the pictures, but the formal details are tedious reading, and may be familiar to many readers, so the full definitions of the terms marked in ''italics'' are relegated to a Glossary at the end of the article.

Two ways of visualizing the space <math>\mathbb{B}^k\!</math> of <math>2^k\!</math> points are the [[hypercube]] picture and the [[venn diagram]] picture.  The hypercube picture associates each point of <math>\mathbb{B}^k\!</math> with a unique point of the <math>k\!</math>-dimensional hypercube.  The venn diagram picture associates each point of <math>\mathbb{B}^k\!</math> with a unique "cell" of the venn diagram on <math>k\!</math> "circles".

Two ways of visualizing the space <math>\mathbb{B}^k~\!</math> of <math>2^k~\!</math> points are the [[hypercube]] picture and the [[venn diagram]] picture.  The hypercube picture associates each point of <math>\mathbb{B}^k~\!</math> with a unique point of the <math>k~\!</math>-dimensional hypercube.  The venn diagram picture associates each point of <math>\mathbb{B}^k~\!</math> with a unique "cell" of the venn diagram on <math>k~\!</math> "circles".

In addition, each point of <math>\mathbb{B}^k\!</math> is the unique point in the ''[[fiber (mathematics)|fiber]] of truth'' <math>[|s|]\!</math> of a ''singular proposition'' <math>s : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B},\!</math> and thus it is the unique point where a ''singular conjunction'' of <math>k\!</math> ''literals'' is <math>1.\!</math>

In addition, each point of <math>\mathbb{B}^k~\!</math> is the unique point in the ''[[fiber (mathematics)|fiber]] of truth'' <math>[|s|]~\!</math> of a ''singular proposition'' <math>s : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B},~\!</math> and thus it is the unique point where a ''singular conjunction'' of <math>k~\!</math> ''literals'' is <math>1.~\!</math>

For example, consider two cases at opposite vertices of the cube:

For example, consider two cases at opposite vertices of the cube:

{| align="center" cellpadding="4" width="90%"

{| align="center" cellpadding="4" width="90%"

| valign="top" | <big>&bull;</big>

| valign="top" | <big>&bull;</big>

| The point <math>(1, 1, \ldots , 1, 1)\!</math> with all 1's as coordinates is the point where the conjunction of all posited variables evaluates to <math>1,\!</math> namely, the point where:

| The point <math>(1, 1, \ldots , 1, 1)~\!</math> with all 1's as coordinates is the point where the conjunction of all posited variables evaluates to <math>1,~\!</math> namely, the point where:

|-

|-

| &nbsp;

| &nbsp;

| align="center" | <math>x_1 ~ x_2 ~\ldots~ x_{n-1} ~ x_n ~=~ 1.\!</math>

| align="center" | <math>x_1 ~ x_2 ~\ldots~ x_{n-1} ~ x_n ~=~ 1.~\!</math>

|-

|-

| valign="top" | <big>&bull;</big>

| valign="top" | <big>&bull;</big>

| The point <math>(0, 0, \ldots , 0, 0)\!</math> with all 0's as coordinates is the point where the conjunction of all negated variables evaluates to <math>1,\!</math> namely, the point where:

| The point <math>(0, 0, \ldots , 0, 0)~\!</math> with all 0's as coordinates is the point where the conjunction of all negated variables evaluates to <math>1,~\!</math> namely, the point where:

|-

|-

| &nbsp;

| &nbsp;

| align="center" | <math>\texttt{(} x_1 \texttt{)(} x_2 \texttt{)} \ldots \texttt{(} x_{n-1} \texttt{)(} x_n \texttt{)} ~=~ 1.\!</math>

| align="center" | <math>\texttt{(} x_1 \texttt{)(} x_2 \texttt{)} \ldots \texttt{(} x_{n-1} \texttt{)(} x_n \texttt{)} ~=~ 1.~\!</math>

|}

|}

To pass from these limiting examples to the general case, observe that a singular proposition <math>s : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B}\!</math> can be given canonical expression as a conjunction of literals, <math>s = e_1 e_2 \ldots e_{k-1} e_k\!</math>.  Then the proposition <math>\nu (e_1, e_2, \ldots, e_{k-1}, e_k)\!</math> is <math>1\!</math> on the points adjacent to the point where <math>s\!</math> is <math>1,\!</math> and 0 everywhere else on the cube.

To pass from these limiting examples to the general case, observe that a singular proposition <math>s : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B}~\!</math> can be given canonical expression as a conjunction of literals, <math>s = e_1 e_2 \ldots e_{k-1} e_k~\!</math>.  Then the proposition <math>\nu (e_1, e_2, \ldots, e_{k-1}, e_k)~\!</math> is <math>1~\!</math> on the points adjacent to the point where <math>s~\!</math> is <math>1,~\!</math> and 0 everywhere else on the cube.

For example, consider the case where <math>k = 3.\!</math>  Then the minimal negation operation <math>\nu (p, q, r)\!</math> &mdash; written more simply as <math>\texttt{(p, q, r)}\!</math> &mdash; has the following venn diagram:

For example, consider the case where <math>k = 3.~\!</math>  Then the minimal negation operation <math>\nu (p, q, r)~\!</math> &mdash; written more simply as <math>\texttt{(p, q, r)}~\!</math> &mdash; has the following venn diagram:

{| align="center" cellpadding="8" style="text-align:center"

{| align="center" cellpadding="8" style="text-align:center"

|

|

<p>[[Image:Venn Diagram (P,Q,R).jpg|500px]]</p>

<p>[[Image:Venn Diagram (P,Q,R).jpg|500px]]</p>

<p><math>\text{Figure 4.}~~\texttt{(p, q, r)}\!</math></p>

<p><math>\text{Figure 4.}~~\texttt{(p, q, r)}~\!</math></p>

|}

|}

For a contrasting example, the boolean function expressed by the form <math>\texttt{((p),(q),(r))}\!</math> has the following venn diagram:

For a contrasting example, the boolean function expressed by the form <math>\texttt{((p),(q),(r))}~\!</math> has the following venn diagram:

{| align="center" cellpadding="8" style="text-align:center"

{| align="center" cellpadding="8" style="text-align:center"

|

|

<p>[[Image:Venn Diagram ((P),(Q),(R)).jpg|500px]]</p>

<p>[[Image:Venn Diagram ((P),(Q),(R)).jpg|500px]]</p>

<p><math>\text{Figure 5.}~~\texttt{((p),(q),(r))}\!</math></p>

<p><math>\text{Figure 5.}~~\texttt{((p),(q),(r))}~\!</math></p>

|}

|}

; Boolean domain

; Boolean domain

: A ''[[boolean domain]]'' <math>\mathbb{B}\!</math> is a generic 2-element set, for example, <math>\mathbb{B} = \{ 0, 1 \},\!</math> whose elements are interpreted as logical values, usually but not invariably with <math>0 = \mathrm{false}\!</math> and <math>1 = \mathrm{true}.\!</math>

: A ''[[boolean domain]]'' <math>\mathbb{B}~\!</math> is a generic 2-element set, for example, <math>\mathbb{B} = \{ 0, 1 \},~\!</math> whose elements are interpreted as logical values, usually but not invariably with <math>0 = \mathrm{false}~\!</math> and <math>1 = \mathrm{true}.~\!</math>

; Boolean variable

; Boolean variable

: A ''[[boolean variable]]'' <math>x\!</math> is a variable that takes its value from a boolean domain, as <math>x \in \mathbb{B}.\!</math>

: A ''[[boolean variable]]'' <math>x~\!</math> is a variable that takes its value from a boolean domain, as <math>x \in \mathbb{B}.~\!</math>

; Proposition

; Proposition

: In situations where boolean values are interpreted as logical values, a [[boolean-valued function]] <math>f : X \to \mathbb{B}\!</math> or a [[boolean function]] <math>g : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B}\!</math> is frequently called a ''[[proposition]]''.

: In situations where boolean values are interpreted as logical values, a [[boolean-valued function]] <math>f : X \to \mathbb{B}~\!</math> or a [[boolean function]] <math>g : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B}~\!</math> is frequently called a ''[[proposition]]''.

; Basis element, Coordinate projection

; Basis element, Coordinate projection

: Given a sequence of <math>k\!</math> boolean variables, <math>x_1, \ldots, x_k,\!</math> each variable <math>x_j\!</math> may be treated either as a ''basis element'' of the space <math>\mathbb{B}^k\!</math> or as a ''coordinate projection'' <math>x_j : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B}.\!</math>

: Given a sequence of <math>k~\!</math> boolean variables, <math>x_1, \ldots, x_k,~\!</math> each variable <math>x_j~\!</math> may be treated either as a ''basis element'' of the space <math>\mathbb{B}^k~\!</math> or as a ''coordinate projection'' <math>x_j : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B}.~\!</math>

; Basic proposition

; Basic proposition

: This means that the set of objects <math>\{ x_j : 1 \le j \le k \}\!</math> is a set of boolean functions <math>\{ x_j : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B} \}\!</math> subject to logical interpretation as a set of ''basic propositions'' that collectively generate the complete set of <math>2^{2^k}\!</math> propositions over <math>\mathbb{B}^k.\!</math>

: This means that the set of objects <math>\{ x_j : 1 \le j \le k \}~\!</math> is a set of boolean functions <math>\{ x_j : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B} \}~\!</math> subject to logical interpretation as a set of ''basic propositions'' that collectively generate the complete set of <math>2^{2^k}~\!</math> propositions over <math>\mathbb{B}^k.~\!</math>

; Literal

; Literal

: A ''literal'' is one of the <math>2k\!</math> propositions <math>x_1, \ldots, x_k, \texttt{(} x_1 \texttt{)}, \ldots, \texttt{(} x_k \texttt{)},\!</math> in other words, either a ''posited'' basic proposition <math>x_j\!</math> or a ''negated'' basic proposition <math>\texttt{(} x_j \texttt{)},\!</math> for some <math>j = 1 ~\text{to}~ k.\!</math>

: A ''literal'' is one of the <math>2k~\!</math> propositions <math>x_1, \ldots, x_k, \texttt{(} x_1 \texttt{)}, \ldots, \texttt{(} x_k \texttt{)},~\!</math> in other words, either a ''posited'' basic proposition <math>x_j~\!</math> or a ''negated'' basic proposition <math>\texttt{(} x_j \texttt{)},~\!</math> for some <math>j = 1 ~\text{to}~ k.~\!</math>

; Fiber

; Fiber

: In mathematics generally, the ''[[fiber (mathematics)|fiber]]'' of a point <math>y \in Y\!</math> under a function <math>f : X \to Y\!</math> is defined as the inverse image <math>f^{-1}(y) \subseteq X.\!</math>

: In mathematics generally, the ''[[fiber (mathematics)|fiber]]'' of a point <math>y \in Y~\!</math> under a function <math>f : X \to Y~\!</math> is defined as the inverse image <math>f^{-1}(y) \subseteq X.~\!</math>

: In the case of a boolean function <math>f : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B},\!</math> there are just two fibers:

: In the case of a boolean function <math>f : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B},~\!</math> there are just two fibers:

: The fiber of <math>0\!</math> under <math>f,\!</math> defined as <math>f^{-1}(0),\!</math> is the set of points where the value of <math>f\!</math> is <math>0.\!</math>

: The fiber of <math>0~\!</math> under <math>f,~\!</math> defined as <math>f^{-1}(0),~\!</math> is the set of points where the value of <math>f~\!</math> is <math>0.~\!</math>

: The fiber of <math>1\!</math> under <math>f,\!</math> defined as <math>f^{-1}(1),\!</math> is the set of points where the value of <math>f\!</math> is <math>1.\!</math>

: The fiber of <math>1~\!</math> under <math>f,~\!</math> defined as <math>f^{-1}(1),~\!</math> is the set of points where the value of <math>f~\!</math> is <math>1.~\!</math>

; Fiber of truth

; Fiber of truth

: When <math>1\!</math> is interpreted as the logical value <math>\mathrm{true},\!</math> then <math>f^{-1}(1)\!</math> is called the ''fiber of truth'' in the proposition <math>f.\!</math>  Frequent mention of this fiber makes it useful to have a shorter way of referring to it.  This leads to the definition of the notation <math>[|f|] = f^{-1}(1)\!</math> for the fiber of truth in the proposition <math>f.\!</math>

: When <math>1~\!</math> is interpreted as the logical value <math>\mathrm{true},~\!</math> then <math>f^{-1}(1)~\!</math> is called the ''fiber of truth'' in the proposition <math>f.~\!</math>  Frequent mention of this fiber makes it useful to have a shorter way of referring to it.  This leads to the definition of the notation <math>[|f|] = f^{-1}(1)~\!</math> for the fiber of truth in the proposition <math>f.~\!</math>

; Singular boolean function

; Singular boolean function

: A ''singular boolean function'' <math>s : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B}\!</math> is a boolean function whose fiber of <math>1\!</math> is a single point of <math>\mathbb{B}^k.\!</math>

: A ''singular boolean function'' <math>s : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B}~\!</math> is a boolean function whose fiber of <math>1~\!</math> is a single point of <math>\mathbb{B}^k.~\!</math>

; Singular proposition

; Singular proposition

: In the interpretation where <math>1\!</math> equals <math>\mathrm{true},\!</math> a singular boolean function is called a ''singular proposition''.

: In the interpretation where <math>1~\!</math> equals <math>\mathrm{true},~\!</math> a singular boolean function is called a ''singular proposition''.

: Singular boolean functions and singular propositions serve as functional or logical representatives of the points in <math>\mathbb{B}^k.\!</math>

: Singular boolean functions and singular propositions serve as functional or logical representatives of the points in <math>\mathbb{B}^k.~\!</math>

; Singular conjunction

; Singular conjunction

: A ''singular conjunction'' in <math>\mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B}\!</math> is a conjunction of <math>k\!</math> literals that includes just one conjunct of the pair <math>\{ x_j, ~\nu(x_j) \}\!</math> for each <math>j = 1 ~\text{to}~ k.\!</math>

: A ''singular conjunction'' in <math>\mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B}~\!</math> is a conjunction of <math>k~\!</math> literals that includes just one conjunct of the pair <math>\{ x_j, ~\nu(x_j) \}~\!</math> for each <math>j = 1 ~\text{to}~ k.~\!</math>

: A singular proposition <math>s : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B}\!</math> can be expressed as a singular conjunction:

: A singular proposition <math>s : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B}~\!</math> can be expressed as a singular conjunction:

{| align="center" cellspacing"10" width="90%"

{| align="center" cellspacing"10" width="90%"

| height="36" | <math>s ~=~ e_1 e_2 \ldots e_{k-1} e_k\!</math>,

| height="36" | <math>s ~=~ e_1 e_2 \ldots e_{k-1} e_k~\!</math>,

|-

|-

|

|

[[Category:Logic]]

[[Category:Logic]]

[[Category:Logical Graphs]]

[[Category:Logical Graphs]]

[[Category:Mathematics]]

[[Category:Mathematics]]

[[Category:Neural Networks]]

[[Category:Neural Networks]]

[[Category:Propositional Calculus]]

[[Category:Propositional Calculus]]

[[Category:Semiotics]]

[[Category:Semiotics]]