Line 704: |
Line 704: |
| | | |
| {| align="center" cellpadding="8" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" |
− | | [[Image:Logical Graph (P (Q)) (P (R)).jpg|500px]] || (30) | + | | [[Image:Logical Graph (P (Q)) (P (R)).jpg|500px]] || (α) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 715: |
Line 715: |
| Since the expression <math>\texttt{(} p \texttt{(} q \texttt{))(} p \texttt{(} r \texttt{))}</math> involves just three variables, it may be worth the trouble to draw a venn diagram of the situation. There are in fact two different ways to execute the picture. | | Since the expression <math>\texttt{(} p \texttt{(} q \texttt{))(} p \texttt{(} r \texttt{))}</math> involves just three variables, it may be worth the trouble to draw a venn diagram of the situation. There are in fact two different ways to execute the picture. |
| | | |
− | Figure 31 indicates the points of the universe of discourse <math>X\!</math> for which the proposition <math>f : X \to \mathbb{B}</math> has the value 1, here interpreted as the logical value <math>\operatorname{true}.</math> In this ''paint by numbers'' style of picture, one simply paints over the cells of a generic template for the universe <math>X,\!</math> going according to some previously adopted convention, for instance: Let the cells that get the value 0 under <math>f\!</math> remain untinted and let the cells that get the value 1 under <math>f\!</math> be painted or shaded. In doing this, it may be good to remind ourselves that the value of the picture as a whole is not in the ''paints'', in other words, the <math>0, 1\!</math> in <math>\mathbb{B},</math> but in the pattern of regions that they indicate. | + | Figure β indicates the points of the universe of discourse <math>X\!</math> for which the proposition <math>f : X \to \mathbb{B}</math> has the value 1, here interpreted as the logical value <math>\operatorname{true}.</math> In this ''paint by numbers'' style of picture, one simply paints over the cells of a generic template for the universe <math>X,\!</math> going according to some previously adopted convention, for instance: Let the cells that get the value 0 under <math>f\!</math> remain untinted and let the cells that get the value 1 under <math>f\!</math> be painted or shaded. In doing this, it may be good to remind ourselves that the value of the picture as a whole is not in the ''paints'', in other words, the <math>0, 1\!</math> in <math>\mathbb{B},</math> but in the pattern of regions that they indicate. |
| | | |
| {| align="center" cellpadding="8" style="text-align:center" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" style="text-align:center" |
− | | [[Image:Venn Diagram (P (Q)) (P (R)).jpg|500px]] || (31) | + | | [[Image:Venn Diagram (P (Q)) (P (R)).jpg|500px]] || (β) |
| |- | | |- |
| | <math>\text{Venn Diagram for}~ \texttt{(} p \texttt{~(} q \texttt{))~(} p \texttt{~(} r \texttt{))}</math> | | | <math>\text{Venn Diagram for}~ \texttt{(} p \texttt{~(} q \texttt{))~(} p \texttt{~(} r \texttt{))}</math> |
Line 727: |
Line 727: |
| The easiest way to see the sense of the venn diagram is to notice that the expression <math>\texttt{(} p \texttt{(} q \texttt{))},</math> read as <math>p \Rightarrow q,</math> can also be read as <math>{}^{\backprime\backprime} \operatorname{not}~ p ~\operatorname{without}~ q {}^{\prime\prime}.</math> Its assertion effectively excludes any tincture of truth from the region of <math>P\!</math> that lies outside the region <math>Q.\!</math> In a similar manner, the expression <math>\texttt{(} p \texttt{(} r \texttt{))},</math> read as <math>p \Rightarrow r,</math> can also be read as <math>{}^{\backprime\backprime} \operatorname{not}~ p ~\operatorname{without}~ r {}^{\prime\prime}.</math> Asserting it effectively excludes any tincture of truth from the region of <math>P\!</math> that lies outside the region <math>R.\!</math> | | The easiest way to see the sense of the venn diagram is to notice that the expression <math>\texttt{(} p \texttt{(} q \texttt{))},</math> read as <math>p \Rightarrow q,</math> can also be read as <math>{}^{\backprime\backprime} \operatorname{not}~ p ~\operatorname{without}~ q {}^{\prime\prime}.</math> Its assertion effectively excludes any tincture of truth from the region of <math>P\!</math> that lies outside the region <math>Q.\!</math> In a similar manner, the expression <math>\texttt{(} p \texttt{(} r \texttt{))},</math> read as <math>p \Rightarrow r,</math> can also be read as <math>{}^{\backprime\backprime} \operatorname{not}~ p ~\operatorname{without}~ r {}^{\prime\prime}.</math> Asserting it effectively excludes any tincture of truth from the region of <math>P\!</math> that lies outside the region <math>R.\!</math> |
| | | |
− | Figure 32 shows the other standard way of drawing a venn diagram for such a proposition. In this ''punctured soap film'' style of picture — others may elect to give it the more dignified title of a ''logical quotient topology'' — one begins with Figure 31 and then proceeds to collapse the fiber of 0 under <math>X\!</math> down to the point of vanishing utterly from the realm of active contemplation, arriving at the following picture: | + | Figure γ shows the other standard way of drawing a venn diagram for such a proposition. In this ''punctured soap film'' style of picture — others may elect to give it the more dignified title of a ''logical quotient topology'' — one begins with Figure 31 and then proceeds to collapse the fiber of 0 under <math>X\!</math> down to the point of vanishing utterly from the realm of active contemplation, arriving at the following picture: |
| | | |
| {| align="center" cellpadding="8" style="text-align:center" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" style="text-align:center" |
− | | [[Image:Venn Diagram (P (Q R)).jpg|500px]] || (32) | + | | [[Image:Venn Diagram (P (Q R)).jpg|500px]] || (γ) |
| |- | | |- |
| | <math>\text{Venn Diagram for}~ \texttt{(} p \texttt{~(} q ~ r \texttt{))}</math> | | | <math>\text{Venn Diagram for}~ \texttt{(} p \texttt{~(} q ~ r \texttt{))}</math> |
Line 764: |
Line 764: |
| | | |
| {| align="center" cellpadding="8" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" |
− | | [[Image:Logical Graph (P (Q)) (P (R)) = (P (Q R)).jpg|500px]] || (33) | + | | [[Image:Logical Graph (P (Q)) (P (R)) = (P (Q R)).jpg|500px]] || (δ) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 781: |
Line 781: |
| {| align="center" cellpadding="8" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" |
| | [[Image:Logical Graph (P (Q)) (P (R)) = (P (Q R)) Proof 1.jpg|500px]] | | | [[Image:Logical Graph (P (Q)) (P (R)) = (P (Q R)) Proof 1.jpg|500px]] |
− | | (34) | + | | (ε) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 834: |
Line 834: |
| | [[Image:Equational Inference Bar -- DNF.jpg|500px]] | | | [[Image:Equational Inference Bar -- DNF.jpg|500px]] |
| |} | | |} |
− | | (35) | + | | (ζ) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 841: |
Line 841: |
| {| align="center" cellpadding="8" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" |
| | [[Image:Logical Graph (P (Q)) (P (R)) DNF.jpg|500px]] | | | [[Image:Logical Graph (P (Q)) (P (R)) DNF.jpg|500px]] |
− | | (36) | + | | (η) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 860: |
Line 860: |
| o-----------------------------------------------------------o | | o-----------------------------------------------------------o |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
− | | (37) | + | | (θ) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 907: |
Line 907: |
| | [[Image:Equational Inference Bar -- DNF.jpg|500px]] | | | [[Image:Equational Inference Bar -- DNF.jpg|500px]] |
| |} | | |} |
− | | (38) | + | | (ι) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 913: |
Line 913: |
| | | |
| {| align="center" cellpadding="8" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" |
− | | [[Image:Logical Graph (P Q R , (P)).jpg|500px]] || (39) | + | | [[Image:Logical Graph (P Q R , (P)).jpg|500px]] || (κ) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 919: |
Line 919: |
| | | |
| {| align="center" cellpadding="8" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" |
− | | [[Image:Logical Graph ((P , P Q R)).jpg|500px]] || (40) | + | | [[Image:Logical Graph ((P , P Q R)).jpg|500px]] || (λ) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 939: |
Line 939: |
| o-----------------------------------------------------------o | | o-----------------------------------------------------------o |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
− | | (41) | + | | (μ) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 958: |
Line 958: |
| o-----------------------------------------------------------o | | o-----------------------------------------------------------o |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
− | | (42) | + | | (ν) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 989: |
Line 989: |
| o-----------------------------------------------------------o | | o-----------------------------------------------------------o |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
− | | (43) | + | | (ξ) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 1,024: |
Line 1,024: |
| {| align="center" cellpadding="8" | | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" |
| | [[Image:Logical Graph (( (P (Q)) (P (R)) , (P (Q R)) )).jpg|500px]] | | | [[Image:Logical Graph (( (P (Q)) (P (R)) , (P (Q R)) )).jpg|500px]] |
− | | (44) | + | | (ο) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
Line 1,103: |
Line 1,103: |
| | [[Image:Equational Inference Bar -- QED.jpg|500px]] | | | [[Image:Equational Inference Bar -- QED.jpg|500px]] |
| |} | | |} |
− | | (45) | + | | (π) |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |