7,909
edits
Changes
→Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard
::: Yes, he is part of the problem, but what's happening with Admin. Am I missing something here? I've meet some realy nice editors and some bad ones, but in the end somebody (or somebodies) has to make the '''main''' call. Are there any similarities with your situation? [[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 05:28, 24 October 2009 (PDT)
::: Yes, he is part of the problem, but what's happening with Admin. Am I missing something here? I've meet some realy nice editors and some bad ones, but in the end somebody (or somebodies) has to make the '''main''' call. Are there any similarities with your situation? [[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 05:28, 24 October 2009 (PDT)
:::: Do you mean by 'admin' the administration in general? Or a particular admin? Administrators generally can't make content judgments, only on behaviour, which is the main problem with Wikipedia [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 06:00, 24 October 2009 (PDT)
:::: Do you mean by 'admin' the administration in general? Or a particular admin? Administrators generally can't make content judgments, only on behaviour, which is the main problem with Wikipedia [[User:Ockham|Ockham]] 06:00, 24 October 2009 (PDT)
::::: Ok, thats interesting. How about when editor approaches "Neutral point of view/Noticeboard, with his/hers concerns and there is no responds (except my mate). Even though the issues a very serious. I have seen this with many others.[[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 06:24, 24 October 2009 (PDT)