| Line 1,682: |
Line 1,682: |
| | & = & | | & = & |
| | ^{\backprime\backprime} \, (S_1)_{[1]} \, ^{\prime\prime} | | ^{\backprime\backprime} \, (S_1)_{[1]} \, ^{\prime\prime} |
| − | \, \land \ldots \land \, | + | \, \land \, \ldots \, \land \, |
| | ^{\backprime\backprime} \, (S_k)_{[k]} \, ^{\prime\prime}. | | ^{\backprime\backprime} \, (S_k)_{[k]} \, ^{\prime\prime}. |
| | \end{array}</math> | | \end{array}</math> |
| | |} | | |} |
| | | | |
| − | <pre>
| + | In a similar vein, a strait of the form <math>S_1 \times \ldots \times S_k\!</math> can be expressed in terms of simpler straits, namely, as an intersection of its <math>k\!</math> extracts: |
| − | In a similar vein, a strait of the form S_1 x ... x S_k | |
| − | can be expressed in terms of simpler straits, namely, | |
| − | as an intersection of its k extracts: | |
| | | | |
| − | S_1 x ... x S_k = S_1_<1> |^| ... |^| S_k_<k>.
| + | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" width="90%" |
| | + | | |
| | + | <math>\begin{array}{lll} |
| | + | S_1 \times \ldots \times S_k & = & (S_1)_{[1]} \, \cap \, \ldots \, \cap \, (S_k)_{[k]}. |
| | + | \end{array}</math> |
| | + | |} |
| | | | |
| − | There is a measure of ambiguity that remains in this formulation, | + | There is a measure of ambiguity that remains in this formulation, but it is the best that I can do in the present informal context. |
| − | but it is the best that I can do in the present informal context. | |
| − | </pre>
| |
| | | | |
| | ==The Cactus Language : Mechanics== | | ==The Cactus Language : Mechanics== |