3,209
edits
Changes
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Tuesday November 26, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to searchDirectory:Logic Museum/sandbox (view source)
Revision as of 13:11, 31 December 2008
, 13:11, 31 December 2008no edit summary
Brief introduction
== chapter 1 ==
{| border=1 cellpadding=10"
{| border=1 cellpadding=10"
!valign = top width=45%|Latin
!valign = top width=45%|Latin
!valign = top width=55%|English
!valign = top width=55%|English
|- valign = top
|- valign = top
|| <a name = "c1"><b>Pars I CAP. 1. DE DEFINITIONE TERMINI ET EIUS DIVISIONE IN GENERALI</b>
|| <b>Pars I CAP. 1. DE DEFINITIONE TERMINI ET EIUS DIVISIONE IN GENERALI</b>
|| ON THE DEFINITION OF 'TERM', AND OF THE DIVISION OF IT IN GENERAL
|| ON THE DEFINITION OF 'TERM', AND OF THE DIVISION OF IT IN GENERAL
|}
|}
== Chapter 3 ==
{| border=1 cellpadding=10"
{| border=1 cellpadding=10"
|- valign = top
|- valign = top
|| <a name = "c3"><b>CAP. 3. DE DIVISIONE TERMINI INCOMPLEXI</b>
|| <b>CAP. 3. DE DIVISIONE TERMINI INCOMPLEXI</b>
|| ON THE DIVISION OF THE NON-COMPLEX TERM
|| ON THE DIVISION OF THE NON-COMPLEX TERM
|| (13) Nec miretur aliquis quod dico aliqua nomina et verba esse mentalia, sed prius legat Boethium super Perihermenias , et hoc ibidem inveniet. Et ideo quando Aristoteles tam nomen quam verbum definit per vocem, accipit ibi nomen et verbum magis stricte, scilicet pro nomine et verbo vocali.
|| (13) Nec miretur aliquis quod dico aliqua nomina et verba esse mentalia, sed prius legat Boethium super Perihermenias , et hoc ibidem inveniet. Et ideo quando Aristoteles tam nomen quam verbum definit per vocem, accipit ibi nomen et verbum magis stricte, scilicet pro nomine et verbo vocali.
|| Nor should anyone wonder that I say that some names and verbs are mental, but he should first read Boethius on the <i>De interpretatione</i>, and he will find it there. And for that reason, when Aristotle defines the name, just as the verb, through 'an utterance', he takes there 'name' and 'verb' strictly, i.e., for a spoken name and verb.
|| Nor should anyone wonder that I say that some names and verbs are mental, but he should first read Boethius on the <i>De interpretatione</i>, and he will find it there. And for that reason, when Aristotle defines the name, just as the verb, through 'an utterance', he takes there 'name' and 'verb' strictly, i.e., for a spoken name and verb.
|}
== Chapter 12 ==
{| border=1 cellpadding=10"
!valign = top width=45%|
!valign = top width=55%|
|- valign = top
|- valign = top
|| <a name = "c12"><b>CAP. 12. QUID EST INTENTIO PRIMA ET QUID SECUNDA ET QUOMODO DISTINGUUNTUR AB INVICEM</b>
|| <b>CAP. 12. QUID EST INTENTIO PRIMA ET QUID SECUNDA ET QUOMODO DISTINGUUNTUR AB INVICEM</b>
|| WHAT A FIRST INTENTION IS, & WHAT A SECOND IS, AND IN WHAT WAY THEY ARE DISTINGUISHED FROM ONE ANOTHER
|| WHAT A FIRST INTENTION IS, & WHAT A SECOND IS, AND IN WHAT WAY THEY ARE DISTINGUISHED FROM ONE ANOTHER
