MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Saturday November 23, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
51 bytes removed
, 18:55, 19 September 2008
Line 101: |
Line 101: |
| | | |
| | | |
− | *(Major premiss) There is an important difference between principled and good-faith criticism of a contributor, and personal attack or harassment. | + | *Principled and good-faith criticism of another person is not the same thing as a personal attack or harassment. |
− | * (Minor premiss) My criticism of the editor called FT2 has been principled and in good faith. My actions should not therefore be labelled as 'harassment'. | + | * My criticism of the editor called FT2 has been principled and in good faith. My actions should not therefore be labelled as 'harassment'. |
| | | |
| The major premiss is clear. Everyone accepts that fair and principled criticism of another editor's action is essential to the continued survival of the Wikipedia project. To demonstrate the minor premiss, it will be necessary to discuss and [[#Criticism of FT2 | criticise]] some of FT2's contributions to the Wikipedia project, and to see how the [[#Blocks of Peter Damian | blocks of Peter Damian]] are connected with this. | | The major premiss is clear. Everyone accepts that fair and principled criticism of another editor's action is essential to the continued survival of the Wikipedia project. To demonstrate the minor premiss, it will be necessary to discuss and [[#Criticism of FT2 | criticise]] some of FT2's contributions to the Wikipedia project, and to see how the [[#Blocks of Peter Damian | blocks of Peter Damian]] are connected with this. |