MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Monday September 30, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
12 bytes added
, 17:54, 14 October 2007
Line 22: |
Line 22: |
| I am going to experiment with an interlacing commentary on Peirce's 1870 "Logic of Relatives" paper, revisiting some critical transitions from several different angles and calling attention to a variety of puzzles, problems, and potentials that are not so often remarked or tapped. | | I am going to experiment with an interlacing commentary on Peirce's 1870 "Logic of Relatives" paper, revisiting some critical transitions from several different angles and calling attention to a variety of puzzles, problems, and potentials that are not so often remarked or tapped. |
| | | |
− | What strikes me about the initial installment this time around is its use of a certain pattern of argument that I can recognize as invoking a "closure principle", and this is a figure of reasoning that Peirce uses in three other places: his discussion of "continuous relations", his definition of sign relations, and in the pragmatic maxim itself. | + | What strikes me about the initial installment this time around is its use of a certain pattern of argument that I can recognize as invoking a "closure principle", and this is a figure of reasoning that Peirce uses in three other places: his discussion of "[[continuous relation]]s", his definition of [[sign relation]]s, and in the [[pragmatic maxim]] itself. |
| | | |
| One might also call attention to the following two statements: | | One might also call attention to the following two statements: |