MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday November 22, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
14 bytes removed
, 02:38, 2 September 2010
Line 11,656: |
Line 11,656: |
| =====1.4.1.2. Types of Conduct===== | | =====1.4.1.2. Types of Conduct===== |
| | | |
− | <pre>
| |
| The chief distinction that applies to different forms of conduct is whether the object is the same sort of thing as the states or whether it is something entirely different, a thing apart, of a wholly other order. Although I am using different words for objects and states, it is always possible that these words are indicative of different roles in a formal relation and not indicative of substantially different types of things. If objects and states are but formal points and naturally belong to the same domain, then it is conceivable that a temporal sequence of states can include the object in its succession, in other words, that a path through a state space can reach or pass through an object of conduct. But if a form of conduct has an object that is completely different from any one of its temporal states, then the role of the object in regard to the action cannot be like the end or goal of a temporal development. | | The chief distinction that applies to different forms of conduct is whether the object is the same sort of thing as the states or whether it is something entirely different, a thing apart, of a wholly other order. Although I am using different words for objects and states, it is always possible that these words are indicative of different roles in a formal relation and not indicative of substantially different types of things. If objects and states are but formal points and naturally belong to the same domain, then it is conceivable that a temporal sequence of states can include the object in its succession, in other words, that a path through a state space can reach or pass through an object of conduct. But if a form of conduct has an object that is completely different from any one of its temporal states, then the role of the object in regard to the action cannot be like the end or goal of a temporal development. |
| | | |
| What names can be given to these two orders of conduct? | | What names can be given to these two orders of conduct? |
− | </pre>
| |
− |
| |
| | | |
| =====1.4.1.3 Perils of Inquiry===== | | =====1.4.1.3 Perils of Inquiry===== |