MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Friday November 22, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
899 bytes added
, 06:33, 1 August 2010
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| *[http://www.montrealgazette.com/business/Wikipedia%20edits%20traced%20Alberta/3347247/story.html] "Nine attempts were made July 20 and 21 to alter the online encyclopedia's entry on the Joint Strike Fighter, including the removal of any information critical of the Conservative government's plan to spend at least $16 billion on the new fighter aircraft". | | *[http://www.montrealgazette.com/business/Wikipedia%20edits%20traced%20Alberta/3347247/story.html] "Nine attempts were made July 20 and 21 to alter the online encyclopedia's entry on the Joint Strike Fighter, including the removal of any information critical of the Conservative government's plan to spend at least $16 billion on the new fighter aircraft". |
| + | ** [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning_II&diff=374573532&oldid=374555723] Removes "Opposition [[Liberal Party of Canada|Liberal Party]] Leader [[Michael Ignatieff]] immediately called for the [[Canadian House of Commons|House of Commons]] defence committee to reconvene as soon as possible and examine the purchase, calling it a "secretive, unaccountable decision to proceed with this contract." Ignatieff has claimed they would put the sole-sourced contract on hold should they form the next government. The purchase announcement has created Canadian media speculation that, with the national opposition parties uniting against the sole-source contract, that this may bring down the minority Conservative government and force an election over the issue. The media have criticized the aircraft as being too short-ranged and far too complex for Canada's needs." |