Difference between revisions of "Directory:Logic Museum/Manuscripts"
MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Monday November 25, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search| (17 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
== Corpus Christi == | == Corpus Christi == | ||
| − | * Corpus Christi | + | * Corpus Christi D119 |
| + | ** commentary on ''Perihermenias'' possibly Nicholas of Cornwall | ||
| + | * Corpus Christi D230 | ||
| + | **''Exposition of the Isagoge'' Cornibiensis (ff 57r-59v) | ||
* Corpus Christi 250 | * Corpus Christi 250 | ||
| − | * Corpus Christi | + | * Corpus Christi E293B |
| + | ** ''Exposition of the Isagoge'', Nicholas of Cornwall ff 69ra-77va | ||
== Merton == | == Merton == | ||
* Merton 289 | * Merton 289 | ||
| − | * Merton 292 | + | * Merton 292 |
| + | ** [[Simon of Faversham]] - ''Perihermenias''. | ||
| + | ** Simon, ''Quaestiones super Analytica Priora'' (111r-137v). | ||
* Merton 296 | * Merton 296 | ||
| Line 49: | Line 55: | ||
* Caius 344/540 | * Caius 344/540 | ||
| − | **[[William de Bonkes]], Questions on Priscian, | + | ** [[William de Bonkes]], Questions on Priscian (1ra, 19va) |
| − | ** [[John de Stycborn]], Questions on the ''Praedicamenta'', questions on the ''Perihermenias''. | + | ** Anon. ''Quaestiones super Physicam'', I-VIII (Caius 344, ff 105rb-170vb) |
| + | ** [[William de Bonkes]], Questions on the ''Perihermenias'' (Lewry quotes 171rb, 189rb) | ||
| + | ** [[John de Stycborn]], Questions on the ''Praedicamenta'' (inc. 203rb), questions on the ''Perihermenias'' (inc. 210vb, 213rb) | ||
| + | ** ''Syncategoremata'', attr. Walter Burley (ff 230r-264v). | ||
| + | ** Johannes de Waefeld, ''Quaestiones super Physicam'', I (Caius 344, ff. 264ra-277vb) | ||
* Caius 434/434 | * Caius 434/434 | ||
** [[Walter Burley]], Some leaves containing most of ''De exclusivis'' (1r-6r), beginning of ''De exclusivis''. All of ''De exceptivis'', and the beginning of ''De obligationibus'' are lost, the remainder of ''De obligationibus'' (7r-10r). For ''De insolubilibus'', Bradwardine's ''Insolubilia'' is substituted (10-13), ''De suppositionibus'' (13-19). Heytesbury's ''De significationibus propositionum multiplicium'' (19-21), Anonymous ''Sophismata'' and ''Obligationes''. | ** [[Walter Burley]], Some leaves containing most of ''De exclusivis'' (1r-6r), beginning of ''De exclusivis''. All of ''De exceptivis'', and the beginning of ''De obligationibus'' are lost, the remainder of ''De obligationibus'' (7r-10r). For ''De insolubilibus'', Bradwardine's ''Insolubilia'' is substituted (10-13), ''De suppositionibus'' (13-19). Heytesbury's ''De significationibus propositionum multiplicium'' (19-21), Anonymous ''Sophismata'' and ''Obligationes''. | ||
* Caius 448/409 | * Caius 448/409 | ||
** [[Walter Burley]], ''Expositio Sophisticorum Elenchorum''. | ** [[Walter Burley]], ''Expositio Sophisticorum Elenchorum''. | ||
| + | ** [[Walter Burley]], ''Expositio librorum Physicorum'' ff. 172-543 | ||
* Caius 509/386 | * Caius 509/386 | ||
** Commentary on [[De Interpretatione|Perihermenias]] tentatively ascribed to [[John de Seccheville]]. | ** Commentary on [[De Interpretatione|Perihermenias]] tentatively ascribed to [[John de Seccheville]]. | ||
| Line 61: | Line 72: | ||
** William Dallying, probably a Cambridge master, discusses the sophisma 'Anima Antichristi necessario erit' in his questions in the ''Perihermenias'' | ** William Dallying, probably a Cambridge master, discusses the sophisma 'Anima Antichristi necessario erit' in his questions in the ''Perihermenias'' | ||
** [[Walter Burley]], Questions on the ''Posterior Analytics''. | ** [[Walter Burley]], Questions on the ''Posterior Analytics''. | ||
| + | ** Guillelmus de Hennore. ''Sophisma'' 'Sola species definitur'. (23vB & 44rA-46rB) | ||
* Caius 611/341 | * Caius 611/341 | ||
| − | ** Unascribed question on the ''Elenchi'' by an author [[Directory:Logic Museum/Sten Ebbesen|Sten Ebbesen]] has called 'The Englishman'<ref>Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', ''Synthese'', xl (1979)</ref>. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the ''Elenchi'' may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. There is a transcription of questions 21 and 22 in Braakhuis 1981. | + | ** Unascribed question on the ''Elenchi'' by an author [[Directory:Logic Museum/Sten Ebbesen|Sten Ebbesen]] has called 'The Englishman'<ref>Ebbesen, 'The Dead Man is Alive', ''Synthese'', xl (1979)</ref>. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the ''Elenchi'' may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. There is a transcription of questions 21 and 22 in Braakhuis 1981. (1r-24v) |
* Caius 612/543 | * Caius 612/543 | ||
** [[John of Felmingham]], questions on the ''Elenchi''. | ** [[John of Felmingham]], questions on the ''Elenchi''. | ||
| Line 80: | Line 92: | ||
* Q13 - transcribed by John Aston, a monk of Worcester who studied at Gloucester college, Oxford, the Benedictine predecessor of the present Worcester college, in 1294-5. The manuscript is confidently dated no later than 1295, and probably as early as 1270<ref>Ebbesen 1987, 136 and Lewry 1985</ref> | * Q13 - transcribed by John Aston, a monk of Worcester who studied at Gloucester college, Oxford, the Benedictine predecessor of the present Worcester college, in 1294-5. The manuscript is confidently dated no later than 1295, and probably as early as 1270<ref>Ebbesen 1987, 136 and Lewry 1985</ref> | ||
| − | ** [[Roger Bacon]] ''Summa grammatica'' (cf Peterhouse 191). | + | ** [[Roger Bacon]] ''Summa grammatica'' (cf Peterhouse 191) (5ra-24vb. |
| − | ** Anon, commentary on ''Analytica Priora''. | + | ** Anon, commentary on ''Analytica Priora'' (165r-191v). |
** [[Peter of Cornwall]], two ''sophismata''. | ** [[Peter of Cornwall]], two ''sophismata''. | ||
** Questions on the ''Physica'' | ** Questions on the ''Physica'' | ||
| Line 102: | Line 114: | ||
* A.G. Little & F. Pelster, ''Oxford Theology and Theologians AD 1282-1302'' Oxford 1934 | * A.G. Little & F. Pelster, ''Oxford Theology and Theologians AD 1282-1302'' Oxford 1934 | ||
* [[Directory:Logic Museum/Osmund Lewry|Lewry, P.O.]] (ed.), 1985, The Rise of British Logic: Acts of the Sixth European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics , Papers in Mediaeval Studies 7, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, Toronto. | * [[Directory:Logic Museum/Osmund Lewry|Lewry, P.O.]] (ed.), 1985, The Rise of British Logic: Acts of the Sixth European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics , Papers in Mediaeval Studies 7, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, Toronto. | ||
| − | * [[Directory:Logic Museum/Sten Ebbesen|Ebbesen, Sten]], 1987, “Talking about what is no more. Texts by [[Peter of Cornwall]], [[Richard | + | * [[Directory:Logic Museum/Sten Ebbesen|Ebbesen, Sten]], 1987, “Talking about what is no more. Texts by [[Peter of Cornwall]], [[Richard de Clive]], [[Simon of Faversham]] and [[Radulphus Brito]],” [[Directory:Logic Museum/CIMAGL|Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin]] 55, Copenhague. |
==Resources== | ==Resources== | ||
Latest revision as of 17:53, 6 May 2010
Corpus Christi
- 119 Robert Kilwardby In Prisc. Min.
Bodleian
- Auct F. 5 23
- Canon Lat. 278
- Canon misc. 278
- Digby 2 - the author's name is given at the end of the compendium on the categories as 'Willelmus fratrum de Montoriel'.
- commentary on Isagoge
- commentary on Perihermenias
- commentary on Praedicamenta.
- Digby 24 - Sophisma Cuiuslibet hominis asinus currit, Magister Abstractionum.
- Digby 55 - a modist treatise, see also Merton 296 (transcribed by R.W.Hunt), beginning Innata est nobis, probably a Parisian composition of around 1280, influenced by Boethius of Dacia, and perhaps representative of teaching which reached Oxford around the time of the condemnations of 1277.
- Digby 204
- Roger Bacon's Summulae Dialectices
- A work by Thomas Aquinas (?)
- Thomas de Wyck a work on the Elenchi in the form of a treatise, possibly influenced by Giles of Rome.
- Lat misc. e 108
Corpus Christi
- Corpus Christi D119
- commentary on Perihermenias possibly Nicholas of Cornwall
- Corpus Christi D230
- Exposition of the Isagoge Cornibiensis (ff 57r-59v)
- Corpus Christi 250
- Corpus Christi E293B
- Exposition of the Isagoge, Nicholas of Cornwall ff 69ra-77va
Merton
- Merton 289
- Merton 292
- Simon of Faversham - Perihermenias.
- Simon, Quaestiones super Analytica Priora (111r-137v).
- Merton 296
New College
- New College 285
Peterhouse
- Peterhouse 152 Anon., Utrum haec sit vera, 'Homo est animal' homine non exsistente, ms. Cambridge (49ra –vb); ed. A. Zimmermann, in 'Eine anonyme Quaestio: 'Utrum haec sit vera 'Homo est animal' homine non exsistente', Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie, 49 (1967), p. 184-8.
- Peterhouse 191: Roger Bacon's Summa Gramatica and Robert Kilwardby's Priscian commentary.
- Peterhouse 205
- Questions on the Elenchi
- Commentary on the Perihermenias sometimes attributed to Kilwardby.
- Peterhouse 206
- Robert Kilwardby, questions on the Perihermenias.
Caius
- Caius 344/540
- William de Bonkes, Questions on Priscian (1ra, 19va)
- Anon. Quaestiones super Physicam, I-VIII (Caius 344, ff 105rb-170vb)
- William de Bonkes, Questions on the Perihermenias (Lewry quotes 171rb, 189rb)
- John de Stycborn, Questions on the Praedicamenta (inc. 203rb), questions on the Perihermenias (inc. 210vb, 213rb)
- Syncategoremata, attr. Walter Burley (ff 230r-264v).
- Johannes de Waefeld, Quaestiones super Physicam, I (Caius 344, ff. 264ra-277vb)
- Caius 434/434
- Walter Burley, Some leaves containing most of De exclusivis (1r-6r), beginning of De exclusivis. All of De exceptivis, and the beginning of De obligationibus are lost, the remainder of De obligationibus (7r-10r). For De insolubilibus, Bradwardine's Insolubilia is substituted (10-13), De suppositionibus (13-19). Heytesbury's De significationibus propositionum multiplicium (19-21), Anonymous Sophismata and Obligationes.
- Caius 448/409
- Walter Burley, Expositio Sophisticorum Elenchorum.
- Walter Burley, Expositio librorum Physicorum ff. 172-543
- Caius 509/386
- Commentary on Perihermenias tentatively ascribed to John de Seccheville.
- Caius 512/543
- Questions on the Quaestiones super librum Elenchorum by John of Felmingham
- William Dallying, probably a Cambridge master, discusses the sophisma 'Anima Antichristi necessario erit' in his questions in the Perihermenias
- Walter Burley, Questions on the Posterior Analytics.
- Guillelmus de Hennore. Sophisma 'Sola species definitur'. (23vB & 44rA-46rB)
- Caius 611/341
- Unascribed question on the Elenchi by an author Sten Ebbesen has called 'The Englishman'[1]. As 'Willelmus vocor' is given as an example of a congruous expression, we may infer that the author's name was 'William'. The version of these questions in the Oxford Oriel 33 has on the first leaf a note that these quires were given by William de Walcote. So it is possible that the Elenchi may be connected with an Englishman who was a fellow of Merton from 1291-1308. There is a transcription of questions 21 and 22 in Braakhuis 1981. (1r-24v)
- Caius 612/543
- John of Felmingham, questions on the Elenchi.
- Caius 668/645
- Thomas Cherminstre, Questions on Priscian
- William de Duffelde, probably an Oxford master around 1300, questions on the Analytica Posteriora.
Pembroke
- Pembroke 193
Cambridge University Library
- Kk3
Worcester Cathedral Library
- Q13 - transcribed by John Aston, a monk of Worcester who studied at Gloucester college, Oxford, the Benedictine predecessor of the present Worcester college, in 1294-5. The manuscript is confidently dated no later than 1295, and probably as early as 1270[2]
- Roger Bacon Summa grammatica (cf Peterhouse 191) (5ra-24vb.
- Anon, commentary on Analytica Priora (165r-191v).
- Peter of Cornwall, two sophismata.
- Questions on the Physica
- Sophisma - nihil est verum nisi in hoc instanti - included in a group of sophismata some of which are ascribed to John of Berwick, master in Oxford c. 1290[3]
Munich
- Munich BSB clm. 14383,
- Pseudo-Aristoteles Secretum secretorum (1r-11v)
- Hervaeus Natalis Quodlibet (12r-39v)
- Jacob of Metz In Sententiarum I dist. (40r-63v)
- Thomas Aquinas Quodlibet III (des. mutil.) (64ra-72vb)
- Miscellenea medica (73ra-80vb)
- Andrew of Cornwall Quaestiones super librum Sex principiorum (81ra-86ra)
- Andrew of Cornwall Questiones super librum Porphyrii (86rb-92va)
- Arwei (Hervaei) Tractatus de articulis Durandi (Colophon: Explicit de articulis pertinentibus ad primum librum Durandi reprobatis ab arvueo)
References
- A.G. Little & F. Pelster, Oxford Theology and Theologians AD 1282-1302 Oxford 1934
- Lewry, P.O. (ed.), 1985, The Rise of British Logic: Acts of the Sixth European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics , Papers in Mediaeval Studies 7, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, Toronto.
- Ebbesen, Sten, 1987, “Talking about what is no more. Texts by Peter of Cornwall, Richard de Clive, Simon of Faversham and Radulphus Brito,” Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin 55, Copenhague.
Resources
- Vatican Film Library at St Louis University
- Vatican library manuscript department
- MASTER (Manuscript Access through Standards for Electronic Records) is a European Union funded project to create a single on-line catalogue of medieval manuscripts in European libraries.
