Changes

7 bytes removed ,  15:12, 17 December 2014
→‎The Aims of Wikipedia Review: there was only ever one trusted users forum. we did talk about having multiple ones but there was never really much point to having more than 1
Line 17: Line 17:  
From its beginning, Wikipedia Review had members who opposed their aims, and prominent pro-Wikipedia people were always welcome to express their views.  This included Wikipedia founder Larry Sanger, and, while Jimbo Wales didn't ever post, he was invited to.   
 
From its beginning, Wikipedia Review had members who opposed their aims, and prominent pro-Wikipedia people were always welcome to express their views.  This included Wikipedia founder Larry Sanger, and, while Jimbo Wales didn't ever post, he was invited to.   
   −
In an effort to stop Wikipedia Review becoming a pro-Wikipedia place, there were always different levels of trust to the users, with people who were anti-Wikipedia having access to certain trusted sub forums, at various times called "trusted users forum", "WR cabal" and "WR anti-cabal".  This generally included administrators as well as anyone who was trusted enough to be an administrator but for various reasons didn't want that position (such as Daniel Brandt and Blissyu2).  Selina was a member of that forum, as tech support, but was never supposed to be an administrator.
+
In an effort to stop Wikipedia Review becoming a pro-Wikipedia place, there were always different levels of trust to the users, with people who were anti-Wikipedia having access to a trusted sub forum, at various times called "trusted users forum", "WR cabal" and "WR anti-cabal".  This generally included administrators as well as anyone who was trusted enough to be an administrator but for various reasons didn't want that position (such as Daniel Brandt and Blissyu2).  Selina was a member of that forum, as tech support, but was never supposed to be an administrator.
    
Following Selina and Somey taking control of Wikipedia Review, they used one of the attempts to take the site from them as an excuse to create their own Mission Statement, which was quoted by several people afterwards.  While this generally agrees with the earlier aims, it was not the original aim of the site.   
 
Following Selina and Somey taking control of Wikipedia Review, they used one of the attempts to take the site from them as an excuse to create their own Mission Statement, which was quoted by several people afterwards.  While this generally agrees with the earlier aims, it was not the original aim of the site.   
95

edits