Changes

::::Whitewashing? As I understand it, Tito was a fairly controversial leader, whose political legacy is still under debate by scholars. What I don't understand is why this article is devoid of any discussion of this scholarly contention. It seems this article is more focused towards listing Tito's awards than presenting any meaningful scholarly analysis of the man. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 19:08, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

::::Whitewashing? As I understand it, Tito was a fairly controversial leader, whose political legacy is still under debate by scholars. What I don't understand is why this article is devoid of any discussion of this scholarly contention. It seems this article is more focused towards listing Tito's awards than presenting any meaningful scholarly analysis of the man. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 19:08, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

'''Note''': Ivan Štambuk statement is very interesting. It might be there just for the benefit of the other Editors, who might know nothing about the historical events of WW2. This happens a lot with the Balkan Editors (something to think about). [[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 00:41, 10 October 2009 (PDT)

'''Note''': Ivan Štambuk statement is very interesting. It might be there just for the benefit of the other Editors, who might not know nothing about the historical events of WW2. This happens a lot with the Balkan Editors (something to think about). [[User:Peter Z.|Peter Z.]] 00:41, 10 October 2009 (PDT)