Changes

MyWikiBiz, Author Your Legacy — Thursday March 28, 2024
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 9: Line 9:  
If so, your stuff was great.  WR made a big mistake in banning you.  A lot of the regulars still bring up your name now and then. [[User:Emperor|Emperor]] 21:31, 11 October 2008 (PDT)
 
If so, your stuff was great.  WR made a big mistake in banning you.  A lot of the regulars still bring up your name now and then. [[User:Emperor|Emperor]] 21:31, 11 October 2008 (PDT)
   −
Yes, I would imagine they would.  My ideas  were always based on cold logic and fundamentally fairness... the problem is there is people try to bend the turth to fit there'd ideas of right and wrong, but truth can not bend and I was the messages which pointed it out and it made for an uncomfortable situation of them being shown to be liars and hypocrites by th'er very words and deeds.  I would think that would made them very angry and it did and they banned me, as the hypocrites they were, to say out of one side...WE BELIEVE IN FREE SPEECH... and THEN WHACK PEOPLE WITH THE BAN HAMMER FOR HAVING A DIFFERING POINT OF VIEW.  Thats what was at issue.[[User:Joehazelton|Joehazelton]] 16:32, 12 October 2008 (PDT)
+
Yes, I would imagine they would.  My ideas  were always based on cold logic and fundamentally fairness... the problem is there was those who tried to bend the truth to fit one persons ideas of right and wrong the only problem is truth can not be bent, and I was the messages which pointed it out so it made for an uncomfortable situation of them being shown to be liars and hypocrites by there'd very words and deeds.  I would think that would made them very angry and it did and they banned me, as the hypocrites they were, to say out of one side...WE BELIEVE IN FREE SPEECH... and THEN WHACK PEOPLE WITH THE BAN HAMMER FOR HAVING A DIFFERING POINT OF VIEW.  Thats what was at issue.[[User:Joehazelton|Joehazelton]] 16:32, 12 October 2008 (PDT)
32

edits

Navigation menu