Changes

:::::Blissy, the first "correction" of your [http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dpqbn5p_0dvbzkzgt cited reference] reads as follows:

:::::Blissy, the first "correction" of your [http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dpqbn5p_0dvbzkzgt cited reference] reads as follows:

::::::''At no stage did Mr.Baxter (as Poetlister or otherwise) give the name Giselle Hillman.  The name Giselle Hillman was given [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mindspillage&diff=next&oldid=32464977 once, by Wikipedia user Zordrac in a message to Wikipedia administrator Mindspillage on 23rd December 2005].''

::::::''At no stage did Mr.Baxter (as Poetlister or otherwise) give the name Gazelle Hillperson.  The name Gazelle Hillperson was given [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mindspillage&diff=next&oldid=32464977 once, by Wikipedia user Zordrac in a message to Wikipedia administrator Mindspillage on 23rd December 2005].''

:::::Is there evidence one way or the other whether User:Zordrac is another sockpuppet of the author of the PoetGuy Caper?  My reading of [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=20205&view=findpost&p=127804 this post by FT2] leads me to infer that FT2 believed Zordrac to be yet another character in the PoetGuy cast of characters.  Have I misread FT2's analysis?  —[[User:Moulton|Moulton]] 19:30, 11 October 2008 (PDT)

:::::Is there evidence one way or the other whether User:Zordrac is another sockpuppet of the author of the PoetGuy Caper?  My reading of [http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=20205&view=findpost&p=127804 this post by FT2] leads me to infer that FT2 believed Zordrac to be yet another character in the PoetGuy cast of characters.  Have I misread FT2's analysis?  —[[User:Moulton|Moulton]] 19:30, 11 October 2008 (PDT)

::::::::That page does not contain any claims by Proabiv.  Please direct me to the place (page and passage therein) where, [http://mywikibiz.com/index.php?title=Talk:Criticism_of_crowdsourcing&diff=71341&oldid=71340 as you write], "''Proabivouac claimed'' that I created the Poetlister identity, based purely on the fact that I had invited Poetlister to use Classmates.com."  I am looking for a page ''written by Proabiv'' and bearing that alleged claim ''in his writing''.  —[[User:Moulton|Moulton]] 14:41, 12 October 2008 (PDT)  

::::::::That page does not contain any claims by Proabiv.  Please direct me to the place (page and passage therein) where, [http://mywikibiz.com/index.php?title=Talk:Criticism_of_crowdsourcing&diff=71341&oldid=71340 as you write], "''Proabivouac claimed'' that I created the Poetlister identity, based purely on the fact that I had invited Poetlister to use Classmates.com."  I am looking for a page ''written by Proabiv'' and bearing that alleged claim ''in his writing''.  —[[User:Moulton|Moulton]] 14:41, 12 October 2008 (PDT)  

:::::::Actually, the report states that the information was "added by " you, not written by: we'd assumed that when you ''referred'' "Giselle Hillman" of Ilford 2000 to classmates.com, that her name then appeared in her class list.[[User:Proabivouac|Proabivouac]] 14:14, 12 October 2008 (PDT)

:::::::Actually, the report states that the information was "added by " you, not written by: we'd assumed that when you ''referred'' "Gazelle Hillperson" of Ilford 2000 to classmates.com, that her name then appeared in her class list.[[User:Proabivouac|Proabivouac]] 14:14, 12 October 2008 (PDT)

Um, User:Zordrac is me.  LOL.  I have used Zordrac since 1996, Blissyu2 since 1998 and Cat since 1992.  I have said on many places that they are all the same person.  Most of the rest of the time, I use my real name (usually just my first name), Adrian.  There are other people that use the name "Zordrac", many other people that use the name "Cat", and a few other people that use the name "Blissyu2" (mostly impersonators - for example Blissyu2 on Wikipedia is not me, but rather was created by probably Antaeus Feldspar or Longhair to impersonate me).  However, I can confirm that indeed User:Zordrac on Wikipedia is the same person as Blissyu2 on Wikipedia Review.  

Um, User:Zordrac is me.  LOL.  I have used Zordrac since 1996, Blissyu2 since 1998 and Cat since 1992.  I have said on many places that they are all the same person.  Most of the rest of the time, I use my real name (usually just my first name), Adrian.  There are other people that use the name "Zordrac", many other people that use the name "Cat", and a few other people that use the name "Blissyu2" (mostly impersonators - for example Blissyu2 on Wikipedia is not me, but rather was created by probably Antaeus Feldspar or Longhair to impersonate me).  However, I can confirm that indeed User:Zordrac on Wikipedia is the same person as Blissyu2 on Wikipedia Review.  

Wikipedia Review has, through its history, been overrun with interpersonal conflict disrupting the actual criticism.  Ultimately, people are going to disagree, and really, who cares?  So long as they aren't doing anything illegal, does it really matter?  Most of the interpersonal conflict issues, though, were started by people trying to destroy the site.  I really see no reason why they should even be included in the site at all.  No Wikipedia administrators allowed.  No vehemently pro-Wikipedia people allowed.  Nobody who hates the site allowed.  Why allow it?  Just have people that are trying to help the site.  Less interpersonal conflict then, and it is more genuine.  Then you can encourage people who are good for the site, and people who love Wikipedia can quite simply go elsewhere.  [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 20:51, 11 October 2008 (PDT)

Wikipedia Review has, through its history, been overrun with interpersonal conflict disrupting the actual criticism.  Ultimately, people are going to disagree, and really, who cares?  So long as they aren't doing anything illegal, does it really matter?  Most of the interpersonal conflict issues, though, were started by people trying to destroy the site.  I really see no reason why they should even be included in the site at all.  No Wikipedia administrators allowed.  No vehemently pro-Wikipedia people allowed.  Nobody who hates the site allowed.  Why allow it?  Just have people that are trying to help the site.  Less interpersonal conflict then, and it is more genuine.  Then you can encourage people who are good for the site, and people who love Wikipedia can quite simply go elsewhere.  [[User:Blissyu2|Blissyu2]] 20:51, 11 October 2008 (PDT)