User contributions
21 December 2014
Talk:Criticism of crowdsourcing
Whatever happened from this?
+373
Talk:Criticism of crowdsourcing
Whatever happened from this?: new section
+340
18 December 2014
User:Blissyu2
not sure what should be there and what shouldn't but for the moment i will blank it
-4,459
Directory:World of Naruto
no need to list all internet aliases
-56
Talk:Wikipedia Review
no edit summary
+184
User:Blissyu2
no edit summary
+29
User:Blissyu2
sorry, that could be considered to be slander. no proof he actually is gay, just that they thought he was. he did hire a gay rights activist as his lawyer, and there are many hints he is gay
+14
User:Blissyu2
A link to the Bodies in the Wheelie bin murder. Sadly, the part about its linking to the Port Arthur massacre is no longer available online
+75
User:Blissyu2
sorry, wrong murder
+5
User:Blissyu2
no edit summary
+16
Planes of Existence
perhaps it is a bit pro-me, but nonetheless that is pretty accurate
Directory:World of Naruto
no edit summary
+15
Directory:World of Naruto
updating website
-35
User:Blissyu2
no edit summary
+112
User:Blissyu2
got those 2 around the wrong way
User:Blissyu2
added one more
+235
User:Blissyu2
no edit summary
+16
User:Blissyu2
That's enough for my resume
17 December 2014
Wikipedia Review
Notes
+203
User talk:Blissyu2
Potentially defamatory claim
+131
Wikipedia Review
including some links - they are all archived, but you can see the proof there
+407
Wikipedia Review
no edit summary
+124
Wikipedia Review
add link
+216
Wikipedia Review
Undo revision 464888 by MyWikiBiz (talk) with all due respect, it is important to write the factually accurate version with the information about the hacking
+4,308
User talk:Blissyu2
Potentially defamatory claim
+260
Wikipedia Review
no edit summary
-248
Wikipedia Review
no need to say who slimvirgin really is
-16
Wikipedia Review
redundant
m-33
Wikipedia Review
no edit summary
m+52
Wikipedia Review
finishing its history - it doesn't really exist anymore
+455
Wikipedia Review
Undo revision 464880 by Blissyu2 (talk) yes it was in 2008, as shown by the link
+74
Wikipedia Review
actually i am not sure when the later hacking took place.
-8
Wikipedia Review
extra bracket
m-1
Wikipedia Review
The Aims of Wikipedia Review
+92
Wikipedia Review
The Aims of Wikipedia Review: calling it succinct is a bit too positive. This was done by one of the people who hacked the site
-15
Wikipedia Review
The Aims of Wikipedia Review: there was only ever one trusted users forum. we did talk about having multiple ones but there was never really much point to having more than 1
-7
Wikipedia Review
Background
+135
Wikipedia Review
Background: fix link
m+1
Wikipedia Review
The Aims of Wikipedia Review: typo
m-1
Wikipedia Review
Just fixing up oh so many things here. I hope that I haven't trodden on any toes here.
+3,828