Line 924: |
Line 924: |
| \end{array}</math> | | \end{array}</math> |
| |} | | |} |
| + | |
| + | In a contextual, implicit, or paraphrastic definition of this sort, the ''definiendum'' is the symbol to be defined, in this case, <math>^{\backprime\backprime} \operatorname{T} ^{\prime\prime},</math> and the ''definiens'' is the entire rest of the context, in this case, the frame <math>^{\backprime\backprime} y(xz) = x(y(z\underline{~~}))\, ^{\prime\prime},</math> that ostensibly defines, or as one says, is supposed to define the symbol <math>^{\backprime\backprime} \operatorname{T} ^{\prime\prime}</math> that we find in its slot. More loosely speaking, the side of the equation with the more known symbols may be called its ''defining'' side. |
| | | |
| <pre> | | <pre> |
− | In a contextual, implicit, or paraphrastic definition of this sort,
| |
− | the "definiendum" is the symbol to be defined, in this case, "T",
| |
− | and the "definiens" is the entire rest of the context, in this
| |
− | case, the frame "y(xz) = x(y(z__))", that ostensibly defines,
| |
− | or as one says, is supposed to define the symbol "T" that
| |
− | we find in its slot. More loosely speaking, the side of
| |
− | the equation with the more known symbols may be called
| |
− | its "defining" side.
| |
− |
| |
| In order to find a minimal generic typing, start with the defining side | | In order to find a minimal generic typing, start with the defining side |
| of the equation, freely assigning types in such a way that the successive | | of the equation, freely assigning types in such a way that the successive |