Changes

Line 4,812: Line 4,812:  
That is, in a universe of perfect human dentition, the number of the relative term <math>\text{tooth of}\,\underline{~~~~}</math> is equal to the number of teeth of humans divided by the number of humans, that is, <math>32.\!</math>
 
That is, in a universe of perfect human dentition, the number of the relative term <math>\text{tooth of}\,\underline{~~~~}</math> is equal to the number of teeth of humans divided by the number of humans, that is, <math>32.\!</math>
   −
The 2-adic relative term ''t'' determines a 2-adic relation ''T''&nbsp;&sube;&nbsp;''U''&nbsp;&times;&nbsp;''V'', where U and V are two universes of discourse, possibly the same one, that hold among other things all of the teeth and all of the people that happen to be under discussion, respectively. To make the case as simple as we can and still cover the point, let's say that there are just four people in our initial universe of discourse, and that just two of them are French.  The bigraphic composition below shows all of the pertinent facts of the case.
+
The 2-adic relative term <math>\mathit{t}\!</math> determines a 2-adic relation <math>T \subseteq U \times V,</math> where <math>U\!</math> and <math>V\!</math> are two universes of discourse, possibly the same one, that contain among other things all the teeth and all the people that happen to be under discussion, respectively.
 +
 
 +
To make the case as simple as we can and still cover the point, let's say that there are just four people in our initial universe of discourse, and that just two of them are French.  The bigraphical composition below shows all pertinent facts of the case.
    
{| align="center" cellspacing ="6" width="90%"
 
{| align="center" cellspacing ="6" width="90%"
12,080

edits