Changes

In the present example, ''S'' = ''I'' = syntactic domain.

In the present example, ''S'' = ''I'' = syntactic domain.

The sign relation associated with a given interpreter ''J'' may be denoted ''L''_''J'' or ''L''(''J'').  Tables 1 and 2 give the sign relations associated with the interpreters ''A'' and ''B'', respectively, putting them in the form of ''[[relational database]]s''.  Thus, the rows of each Table list the ordered triples of the form ‹''o'', ''s'', ''i''› that make up the corresponding sign relations, ''L''_''A'', ''L''_''B'' ⊆ ''O'' × ''S'' × ''I''.  It is often tempting to use the same names for objects and for relations involving these objects, but it is best to avoid this in a first approach, taking up the issues that this practice raises after the less problematic features of these relations have been treated.

The sign relation associated with a given interpreter ''J'' may be denoted ''L''_''J''  or ''L''(''J'').  Tables 1 and 2 give the sign relations associated with the interpreters ''A'' and ''B'', respectively, putting them in the form of ''[[relational database]]s''.  Thus, the rows of each Table list the ordered triples of the form ‹''o'', ''s'', ''i''› that make up the corresponding sign relations, ''L''_''A'' , ''L''_''B''  ⊆ ''O'' × ''S'' × ''I''.  It is often tempting to use the same names for objects and for relations involving these objects, but it is best to avoid this in a first approach, taking up the issues that this practice raises after the less problematic features of these relations have been treated.

 

{| align="center" border="1" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" style="background:lightcyan; font-weight:bold; text-align:center; width:60%"

{| align="center" border="1" cellpadding="8" cellspacing="0" style="background:lightcyan; font-weight:bold; text-align:center; width:60%"