Changes

Let me correct one major slip and a few minor typos in the Figure that I gave last time, and then proceed to explain what I can see rightly in this picture of two distinct ways of factoring a fiber.  The more serious mislabeling is that the interpretant sign ''i'' that was newly inserted in the interpretive framework should have been set equal to the sign value "Humanity" and not the property value ''Humanity''.  The quotes are needed in order to emphasize that ''i'' is a sign or a concept, or being interpreted that way, and not being regarded as an objective attribute, intension, property, or quality, not as viewed via the interpretive frame of the scope.

Let me correct one major slip and a few minor typos in the Figure that I gave last time, and then proceed to explain what I can see rightly in this picture of two distinct ways of factoring a fiber.  The more serious mislabeling is that the interpretant sign ''i'' that was newly inserted in the interpretive framework should have been set equal to the sign value "Humanity" and not the property value ''Humanity''.  The quotes are needed in order to emphasize that ''i'' is a sign or a concept, or being interpreted that way, and not being regarded as an objective attribute, intension, property, or quality, not as viewed via the interpretive frame of the scope.

<font face="courier new"><pre>

<font face="courier new"><pre>

o-----------------------------o-----------------------------o

o-----------------------------o-----------------------------o

o-----------------------------------------------------------o

o-----------------------------------------------------------o

</pre></font>

</pre></font>

That should take care of the immediate potential for confusion.

That should take care of the immediate potential for confusion.