Changes

del note
Line 1,960: Line 1,960:     
This means that <math>\Upsilon q = 1\!</math> if and only if <math>q\!</math> holds for the whole universe of discourse in question, that is, if and only <math>q\!</math> is the constantly true proposition <math>1 : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B}.</math>  The ambiguities of this usage are not a problem so long as we distinguish the context of definition from the context of application and restrict all shorthand notations to the latter.
 
This means that <math>\Upsilon q = 1\!</math> if and only if <math>q\!</math> holds for the whole universe of discourse in question, that is, if and only <math>q\!</math> is the constantly true proposition <math>1 : \mathbb{B}^k \to \mathbb{B}.</math>  The ambiguities of this usage are not a problem so long as we distinguish the context of definition from the context of application and restrict all shorthand notations to the latter.
  −
==Note==
  −
  −
<pre>
  −
To:  NKS
  −
  −
I will need to focus on the DATA thread while I have
  −
the concentration to do so, but an exagoric inquiry
  −
from a reader of that thread prompts me to revisit
  −
for a moment a topic where I previously noticed
  −
some fractal shades lurking about my tables.
  −
I am reorganizing this material on a couple
  −
of other discussion lists, starting here:
  −
  −
FL.  http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/thrd1.html#05480
  −
FL.  http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-March/thread.html#1256
  −
  −
See especially FL Note 4, at either of these web loci:
  −
  −
FL 4.  http://suo.ieee.org/ontology/msg05483.html
  −
FL 4.  http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2004-March/001259.html
  −
</pre>
      
==Document History==
 
==Document History==
12,080

edits