Line 1,099: |
Line 1,099: |
| Grammar 5 is a context-free grammar for the painted cactus language that uses <math>\mathfrak{Q} = \{ \, ^{\backprime\backprime} \, S' \, ^{\prime\prime}, \, ^{\backprime\backprime} \, T \, ^{\prime\prime} \, \},</math> with <math>\mathfrak{K}</math> as listed in the next display. | | Grammar 5 is a context-free grammar for the painted cactus language that uses <math>\mathfrak{Q} = \{ \, ^{\backprime\backprime} \, S' \, ^{\prime\prime}, \, ^{\backprime\backprime} \, T \, ^{\prime\prime} \, \},</math> with <math>\mathfrak{K}</math> as listed in the next display. |
| | | |
− | <pre> | + | <br> |
− | | !C!(!P!). Grammar 5
| |
− | |
| |
− | | !Q! = {"S'", "T"}
| |
− | |
| |
− | | 1. S :> !e!
| |
− | |
| |
− | | 2. S :> S'
| |
− | |
| |
− | | 3. S' :> m_1
| |
− | |
| |
− | | 4. S' :> p_j, for each j in J
| |
− | |
| |
− | | 5. S' :> S' · S'
| |
− | |
| |
− | | 6. S' :> "-()-"
| |
− | |
| |
− | | 7. S' :> "-(" · T · ")-"
| |
− | |
| |
− | | 8. T :> ","
| |
− | |
| |
− | | 9. T :> S'
| |
− | |
| |
− | | 10. T :> T · ","
| |
− | |
| |
− | | 11. T :> T · "," · S'
| |
| | | |
− | Finally, it is worth trying to bring together the advantages of these | + | {| align="center" cellpadding="12" cellspacing="0" style="border-top:1px solid black" width="90%" |
− | diverse styles of grammar, to whatever extent that they are compatible. | + | | align="left" style="border-left:1px solid black;" width="50%" | |
− | To do this, a prospective grammar must be capable of maintaining a high | + | <math>\mathfrak{C} (\mathfrak{P}) : \text{Grammar 5}\!</math> |
− | level of intermediate organization, like that arrived at in Grammar 2, | + | | align="right" style="border-right:1px solid black;" width="50%" | |
− | while respecting the principle of intermediate significance, and thus | + | <math>\mathfrak{Q} = \{ \, ^{\backprime\backprime} \, S' \, ^{\prime\prime}, \, ^{\backprime\backprime} \, T \, ^{\prime\prime} \, \}</math> |
− | accumulating all the benefits of the context-free format in Grammar 5. | + | |- |
− | A plausible synthesis of most of these features is given in Grammar 6. | + | | colspan="2" style="border-top:1px solid black; border-bottom:1px solid black; border-left:1px solid black; border-right:1px solid black" | |
− | </pre>
| + | <math>\begin{array}{rcll} |
| + | 1. |
| + | & S |
| + | & :> |
| + | & \varepsilon |
| + | \\ |
| + | 2. |
| + | & S |
| + | & :> |
| + | & S' |
| + | \\ |
| + | 3. |
| + | & S' |
| + | & :> |
| + | & m_1 |
| + | \\ |
| + | 4. |
| + | & S' |
| + | & :> |
| + | & p_j, \, \text{for each} \, j \in J |
| + | \\ |
| + | 5. |
| + | & S' |
| + | & :> |
| + | & S' \, \cdot \, S' |
| + | \\ |
| + | 6. |
| + | & S' |
| + | & :> |
| + | & ^{\backprime\backprime} \, \operatorname{()} \, ^{\prime\prime} |
| + | \\ |
| + | 7. |
| + | & S' |
| + | & :> |
| + | & ^{\backprime\backprime} \, \operatorname{(} \, ^{\prime\prime} \, \cdot \, T \, \cdot \, ^{\backprime\backprime} \, \operatorname{)} \, ^{\prime\prime} |
| + | \\ |
| + | 8. |
| + | & T |
| + | & :> |
| + | & ^{\backprime\backprime} \, \operatorname{,} \, ^{\prime\prime} |
| + | \\ |
| + | 9. |
| + | & T |
| + | & :> |
| + | & S' |
| + | \\ |
| + | 10. |
| + | & T |
| + | & :> |
| + | & T \, \cdot \, ^{\backprime\backprime} \, \operatorname{,} \, ^{\prime\prime} |
| + | \\ |
| + | 11. |
| + | & T |
| + | & :> |
| + | & T \, \cdot \, ^{\backprime\backprime} \, \operatorname{,} \, ^{\prime\prime} \, \cdot \, S' |
| + | \\ |
| + | \end{array}</math> |
| + | |} |
| + | |
| + | <br> |
| + | |
| + | Finally, it is worth trying to bring together the advantages of these diverse styles of grammar, to whatever extent that they are compatible. To do this, a prospective grammar must be capable of maintaining a high level of intermediate organization, like that arrived at in Grammar 2, while respecting the principle of intermediate significance, and thus accumulating all the benefits of the context-free format in Grammar 5. A plausible synthesis of most of these features is given in Grammar 6. |
| | | |
| ===Grammar 6=== | | ===Grammar 6=== |