3,209
edits
Changes
Directory:The Wikipedia Point of View/Law (view source)
Revision as of 16:34, 3 October 2009
, 16:34, 3 October 2009no edit summary
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&diff=317228946&oldid=317228762]
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard&diff=317228946&oldid=317228762]
==Commnuity reaction==
==Community reaction==
This revelation caused concern among other members of the community, because defending friends "No matter what" implies that no matter what policy a friend breaches, the other friend will cover for them and assist them to evade repercussions. and that It is not enough to trust someone without revealing their secret. If the trust was justified, an appeal would have been successful and allowed him to regain adminship honestly, rather than purposefully assisting a friend in regaining adminship with an alternate account.
This revelation caused concern among other members of the community, because defending friends "No matter what" implies that no matter what policy a friend breaches, the other friend will cover for them and assist them to evade repercussions. and that It is not enough to trust someone without revealing their secret. If the trust was justified, an appeal would have been successful and allowed him to regain adminship honestly, rather than purposefully assisting a friend in regaining adminship with an alternate account.