12,080
edits
Changes
Directory:Jon Awbrey/Papers/Differential Logic (view source)
Revision as of 07:02, 4 June 2009
, 07:02, 4 June 2009→Note 17: edit + markup
==Note 17==
==Note 17==
There a big reasons and little reasons for caring about this humble example. The little reasons we find all under our feet. One big reason I can now quite blazonly enounce in the fashion of this not so subtle subtitle:
'''Obstacles to Applying the Pragmatic Maxim'''
No sooner do you get a good idea and try to apply it than you find that a motley array of obstacles arise.
It seems as if I am constantly lamenting the fact these days that people, and even admitted Peircean persons, do not in practice more consistently apply the maxim of pragmatism to the purpose for which it is purportedly intended by its author. That would be the clarification of concepts, or intellectual symbols, to the point where their inherent senses, or their lacks thereof, would be rendered manifest to all and sundry interpreters.
There are big obstacles and little obstacles to applying the pragmatic maxim. In good subgoaling fashion, I will merely mention a few of the bigger blocks, as if in passing, and then get down to the devilish details that immediately obstruct our way.
and even admitted Peircean persons, do not in practice more consistently
There are big obstacles and little obstacles to applying the pragmatic maxim.
; Obstacle 1
: People do not always read the instructions very carefully. There is a tendency in readers of particular prior persuasions to blow the problem all out of proportion, to think that the maxim is meant to reveal the absolutely positive and the totally unique meaning of every preconception to which they might deign or elect to apply it. Reading the maxim with an even minimal attention, you can see that it promises no such finality of unindexed sense, but ties what you conceive to you. I have lately come to wonder at the tenacity of this misinterpretation. Perhaps people reckon that nothing less would be worth their attention. I am not sure. I can only say the achievement of more modest goals is the sort of thing on which our daily life depends, and there can be no final end to inquiry nor any ultimate community without a continuation of life, and that means life on a day to day basis. All of which only brings me back to the point of persisting with local meantime examples, because if we can't apply the maxim there, we can't apply it anywhere.
And now I need to go out of doors and weed my garden for a time …
And now I need to go out of doors and weed my garden for a time ...
==Note 18==
==Note 18==