Changes

Line 5,658: Line 5,658:  
|}
 
|}
   −
But doing the same thing for the compound relative term <math>(\mathit{s}^\mathit{l})^\mathrm{w}\!</math> is less immediate, the hang-up being that we have yet to define the case of logical involution that raises a 2-adic relative term to the power of a 2-adic relative teram.
+
But doing the same thing for the compound relative term <math>(\mathit{s}^\mathit{l})^\mathrm{w}\!</math> is less immediate, the hang-up being that we have yet to define the case of logical involution that raises a 2-adic relative term to the power of a 2-adic relative term.
    
{| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%"
 
{| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%"
12,080

edits