Changes

Line 135: Line 135:  
| <math>\mathrm{J} ~\text{loves}~ \mathrm{K} ~\Leftarrow~ \mathrm{K} ~\text{is a woman}</math>
 
| <math>\mathrm{J} ~\text{loves}~ \mathrm{K} ~\Leftarrow~ \mathrm{K} ~\text{is a woman}</math>
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
Interpreting the formula <math>\mathit{l}^\mathrm{w}\!</math> as <math>\mathrm{J} ~\text{loves}~ \mathrm{K} ~\Leftarrow~ \mathrm{K} ~\text{is a woman}</math> reveals the form of the converse implication inherent in it, and this evokes the analogy between implication and involution that accounts for the aptness of the latter name.
    
{| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%"
 
{| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%"
Line 160: Line 162:  
</math>
 
</math>
 
|}
 
|}
      
<pre>
 
<pre>
12,089

edits