| <math>\mathrm{J} ~\text{loves}~ \mathrm{K} ~\Leftarrow~ \mathrm{K} ~\text{is a woman}</math>
| <math>\mathrm{J} ~\text{loves}~ \mathrm{K} ~\Leftarrow~ \mathrm{K} ~\text{is a woman}</math>
|}
|}
+
+
Interpreting the formula <math>\mathit{l}^\mathrm{w}\!</math> as <math>\mathrm{J} ~\text{loves}~ \mathrm{K} ~\Leftarrow~ \mathrm{K} ~\text{is a woman}</math> reveals the form of the converse implication inherent in it, and this evokes the analogy between implication and involution that accounts for the aptness of the latter name.