Changes

This says that a lover of every woman in the given universe of discourse is a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime}</math> that is a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime\prime}</math> that is a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime\prime\prime}.</math>  In other words, a lover of every woman in this context is a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime}</math> and a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime\prime}</math> and a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime\prime\prime}.</math>

This says that a lover of every woman in the given universe of discourse is a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime}</math> that is a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime\prime}</math> that is a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime\prime\prime}.</math>  In other words, a lover of every woman in this context is a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime}</math> and a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime\prime}</math> and a lover of <math>\mathrm{W}^{\prime\prime\prime}.</math>

The term ''exponentiation'' is more generally used in mathematics for operations that involve taking a base to a power, since the term ''involution'' is used for a number of unrelated concepts across different contexts.  Operations analogous to taking powers are widespread throughout mathematics and Peirce frequently makes use of them in a number of important applications, for example, in his theory of information.  But that's another story.

The term ''exponentiation'' is more generally used in mathematics for operations that involve taking a base to a power, since the term ''involution'' is used for different concepts in different contexts.  Operations analogous to taking powers are widespread throughout mathematics and Peirce frequently makes use of them in a number of important applications, for example, in his theory of information.  But that's another story.

==References==

==References==