Line 4,210: |
Line 4,210: |
| ===Commentary Note 11.12=== | | ===Commentary Note 11.12=== |
| | | |
− | Since functions are special cases of 2-adic relations, and since the space of 2-adic relations is closed under relational composition, in other words, the composition of a couple of 2-adic relations is again a 2-adic relation, we know that the relational composition of a couple of functions has to be a 2-adic relation. If it is also necessarily a function, then we would be justified in speaking of "functional composition", and also of saying that the space of functions is closed under this functional form of composition. | + | Since functions are special cases of 2-adic relations, and since the space of 2-adic relations is closed under relational composition — in other words, the composition of a pair of 2-adic relations is again a 2-adic relation — we know that the relational composition of two functions has to be a 2-adic relation. If it is also necessarily a function, then we would be justified in speaking of ''functional composition', and also in saying that the space of functions is closed under this functional form of composition. |
| | | |
| Just for novelty's sake, let's try to prove this for relations that are functional on correlates. | | Just for novelty's sake, let's try to prove this for relations that are functional on correlates. |
| | | |
− | So our task is this: Given a couple of 2-adic relations, ''P'' ⊆ ''X'' × ''Y'' and ''Q'' ⊆ ''Y'' × ''Z'', that are functional on correlates,
| + | The task is this — We are given a pair of 2-adic relations: |
− | ''P'' : ''X'' ← ''Y'' and ''Q'' : ''Y'' ← ''Z'', we need to determine whether the relational composition ''P'' o ''Q'' ⊆ ''X'' × ''Z'' is also ''P'' o ''Q'' : ''X'' ← ''Z'', or not.
| + | |
| + | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" style="text-align:center" width="90%" |
| + | | <math>P \subseteq X \times Y \quad \text{and} \quad Q \subseteq Y \times Z</math> |
| + | |} |
| + | |
| + | <math>P\!</math> and <math>Q\!</math> are assumed to be functional on correlates, a premiss that we express as follows: |
| + | |
| + | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" style="text-align:center" width="90%" |
| + | | <math>P : X \leftarrow Y \quad \text{and} \quad Q : Y \leftarrow Z</math> |
| + | |} |
| + | |
| + | We are charged with deciding whether the relational composition <math>P \circ Q \subseteq X \times Z</math> is also functional on correlates, that is, whether <math>P \circ Q : X \leftarrow Z</math> or not. |
| | | |
| It always helps to begin by recalling the pertinent definitions. | | It always helps to begin by recalling the pertinent definitions. |