Line 4,039: |
Line 4,039: |
| In the case of a 2-adic relation ''F'' ⊆ ''X'' × ''Y'' that has the qualifications of a function ''f'' : ''X'' → ''Y'', there are a number of further differentia that arise: | | In the case of a 2-adic relation ''F'' ⊆ ''X'' × ''Y'' that has the qualifications of a function ''f'' : ''X'' → ''Y'', there are a number of further differentia that arise: |
| | | |
− | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" <!--QUOTE-->
| + | :{| cellpadding="4" |
− | |
| |
− | {| cellpadding="4" | |
| | ''f'' is "surjective" | | | ''f'' is "surjective" |
| | iff | | | iff |
Line 4,053: |
Line 4,051: |
| | iff | | | iff |
| | ''f'' is 1-regular at ''Y''. | | | ''f'' is 1-regular at ''Y''. |
− | |}
| |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
| For example, or more precisely, contra example, the function ''f'' : ''X'' → ''Y'' that is depicted below is neither total at ''Y'' nor tubular at ''Y'', and so it cannot enjoy any of the properties of being sur-, or in-, or bi-jective. | | For example, or more precisely, contra example, the function ''f'' : ''X'' → ''Y'' that is depicted below is neither total at ''Y'' nor tubular at ''Y'', and so it cannot enjoy any of the properties of being sur-, or in-, or bi-jective. |
| | | |
| + | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" |
| + | | |
| <pre> | | <pre> |
| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
Line 4,067: |
Line 4,066: |
| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
| + | |} |
| | | |
| A cheap way of getting a surjective function out of any function is to reset its codomain to its range. For example, the range of the function ''f'' above is ''Y''′ = {0, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}. Thus, if we form a new function ''g'' : ''X'' → ''Y''′ that looks just like ''f'' on the domain ''X'' but is assigned the codomain ''Y''′, then ''g'' is surjective, and is described as mapping "onto" ''Y''′. | | A cheap way of getting a surjective function out of any function is to reset its codomain to its range. For example, the range of the function ''f'' above is ''Y''′ = {0, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9}. Thus, if we form a new function ''g'' : ''X'' → ''Y''′ that looks just like ''f'' on the domain ''X'' but is assigned the codomain ''Y''′, then ''g'' is surjective, and is described as mapping "onto" ''Y''′. |
| | | |
| + | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" |
| + | | |
| <pre> | | <pre> |
| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
Line 4,079: |
Line 4,081: |
| 0 2 5 6 7 8 9 | | 0 2 5 6 7 8 9 |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
| + | |} |
| | | |
| The function ''h'' : ''Y''′ → ''Y'' is injective. | | The function ''h'' : ''Y''′ → ''Y'' is injective. |
| | | |
| + | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" |
| + | | |
| <pre> | | <pre> |
| 0 2 5 6 7 8 9 | | 0 2 5 6 7 8 9 |
Line 4,091: |
Line 4,096: |
| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
| + | |} |
| | | |
| The function ''m'' : ''X'' → ''Y'' is bijective. | | The function ''m'' : ''X'' → ''Y'' is bijective. |
| | | |
| + | {| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" |
| + | | |
| <pre> | | <pre> |
| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
Line 4,103: |
Line 4,111: |
| 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
| </pre> | | </pre> |
| + | |} |
| | | |
| ===Commentary Note 11.11=== | | ===Commentary Note 11.11=== |