Line 3,734: |
Line 3,734: |
| |} | | |} |
| | | |
− | If we scan along the ''X'' dimension we see that the "''Y'' incidence degrees" of the ''X'' nodes 0 through 9 are 0, 1, 2, 3, 1, 1, 1, 2, 0, 0, in order. | + | If we scan along the <math>~X~</math> dimension from <math>~0~</math> to <math>~9~</math> we see that the incidence degrees of the <math>~X~</math> nodes with the <math>~Y~</math> domain are <math>~0, 1, 2, 3, 1, 1, 1, 2, 0, 0,~</math> in that order. |
| | | |
− | If we scan along the ''Y'' dimension we see that the "''X'' incidence degrees" of the Y nodes 0 through 9 are 0, 0, 3, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 0, in order. | + | If we scan along the <math>~Y~</math> dimension from <math>~0~</math> to <math>~9~</math> we see that the incidence degrees of the <math>~Y~</math> nodes with the <math>~X~</math> domain are <math>~0, 0, 3, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 0,~</math> in that order. |
| | | |
− | Thus, ''E'' is not total at either ''X'' or ''Y'', since there are nodes in both ''X'' and ''Y'' having incidence degrees that equal 0. | + | Thus, <math>~E~</math> is not total at either <math>~X~</math> or <math>~Y,~</math> since there are nodes in both <math>~X~</math> and <math>~Y~</math> having incidence degrees less than 1. |
| | | |
− | Also, ''E'' is not tubular at either ''X'' or ''Y'', since there exist nodes in both ''X'' and ''Y'' having incidence degrees greater than 1. | + | Also, <math>~E~</math> is not tubular at either <math>~X~</math> or <math>~Y,~</math> since there are nodes in both <math>~X~</math> and <math>~Y~</math> having incidence degrees greater than 1. |
| | | |
− | Clearly, then, ''E'' cannot qualify as a pre-function or a function on either of its relational domains. | + | Clearly, then, <math>~E~</math> cannot qualify as either a pre-function or a function on either of its relational domains. |
| | | |
| ===Commentary Note 11.6=== | | ===Commentary Note 11.6=== |