Changes

Line 1,771: Line 1,771:  
===Commentary Note 8.6===
 
===Commentary Note 8.6===
   −
The foregoing has hopefully filled in enough background that we can begin to make sense of the more mysterious parts of CP 3.73.
+
The foregoing has hopefully filled in enough background that we can begin to make sense of the more mysterious parts of CP 3.73.
    
{| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" <!--QUOTE-->
 
{| align="center" cellspacing="6" width="90%" <!--QUOTE-->
Line 1,777: Line 1,777:  
<p>Thus far, we have considered the multiplication of relative terms only.  Since our conception of multiplication is the application of a relation, we can only multiply absolute terms by considering them as relatives.</p>
 
<p>Thus far, we have considered the multiplication of relative terms only.  Since our conception of multiplication is the application of a relation, we can only multiply absolute terms by considering them as relatives.</p>
   −
<p>Now the absolute term "man" is really exactly equivalent to the relative term "man that is ---", and so with any other.  I shall write a comma after any absolute term to show that it is so regarded as a relative term.</p>
+
<p>Now the absolute term "man" is really exactly equivalent to the relative term "man that is&nbsp;&mdash;&mdash;", and so with any other.  I shall write a comma after any absolute term to show that it is so regarded as a relative term.</p>
 
  −
<p>Then:</p>
  −
 
  −
: <p>"man that is black"</p>
  −
 
  −
<p>will be written</p>
  −
 
  −
: <p>m,b.</p>
      +
<p>Then "man that is black" will be written:</p>
 +
|-
 +
| align="center" | <math>\mathrm{m},\!\mathrm{b}</math>
 +
|-
 +
|
 
<p>(Peirce, CP 3.73).</p>
 
<p>(Peirce, CP 3.73).</p>
 
|}
 
|}
12,080

edits