Changes

Line 266: Line 266:  
<p>'''The Signs for Multiplication'''</p>
 
<p>'''The Signs for Multiplication'''</p>
   −
<p>I shall adopt for the conception of multiplication 'the application of a relation', in such a way that, for example, 'l'w shall denote whatever is lover of a woman.  This notation is the same as that used by Mr. De Morgan, although he apears not to have had multiplication in his mind.</p>
+
<p>I shall adopt for the conception of multiplication ''the application of a relation'', in such a way that, for example, <math>\mathit{l}\mathrm{w}\!</math> shall denote whatever is lover of a woman.  This notation is the same as that used by Mr. De Morgan, although he apears not to have had multiplication in his mind.</p>
 
  −
<p>'s'(m +, w) will, then, denote whatever is servant of anything of the class composed of men and women taken together.  So that:</p>
  −
 
  −
<p>'s'(m +, w)  =  's'm +, 's'w.</p>
      +
<p><math>\mathit{s}(\mathrm{m} ~+\!\!,~ \mathrm{w})</math> will, then, denote whatever is servant of anything of the class composed of men and women taken together.  So that:</p>
 +
|-
 +
| align="center" | <math>\mathit{s}(\mathrm{m} ~+\!\!,~ \mathrm{w}) ~=~ \mathit{s}\mathrm{m} ~+\!\!,~ \mathit{s}\mathrm{w}</math>
 +
|-
 +
|
 
<p>('l' +, 's')w will denote whatever is lover or servant to a woman, and:</p>
 
<p>('l' +, 's')w will denote whatever is lover or servant to a woman, and:</p>
  
12,080

edits