Line 431: |
Line 431: |
| ==Note 9== | | ==Note 9== |
| | | |
− | <pre>
| + | As an object example, let us consider the "transformation of textual elements" (TOTE) in progress: |
− | By virtue of Zipf's law -- yes, there is a dynamics to its economics --
| |
− | I have found myself forced, when it comes to matters that I've been
| |
− | thinking about for "years and years" (YAY) to make a heavy, if not
| |
− | to say an overbearing use of acronyms, both for their utility as
| |
− | mnemonic devices and as a "regime of code compression" (ROCC).
| |
− | I'm well aware that this can be annoying at times, so please
| |
− | forgive what I hope will be a transient nuisance and I will
| |
− | do my level best to unpack these lexical quanta as we go.
| |
| | | |
− | A "moral of the episode" (MOTE) on the wing here:
| + | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" width="90%" |
− | A "transformation of textual elements" (TOTE) is
| + | | <math>x ~=~ f(u, v) ~=~ \underline{((}~ u ~\underline{)(}~ v ~\underline{))}</math> |
− | a "formal or mathematical abstraction" (FOMA) of
| + | |- |
− | a very high order, to wit, a "formal object" (FO).
| + | | <math>y ~=~ g(u, v) ~=~ \underline{((}~ u ~,~ v ~\underline{))}</math> |
| + | |} |
| | | |
− | As an object example, let us consider the TOTE in progress:
| + | {| align="center" cellpadding="8" width="90%" |
− | | + | | <math>(x, y) ~=~ F(u, v) ~=~ ( ~\underline{((}~ u ~\underline{)(}~ v ~\underline{))}~ , ~\underline{((}~ u ~,~ v ~\underline{))}~ ).</math> |
− | <x, y> = F<u, v> = <((u)(v)), ((u, v))> | + | |} |
| | | |
| + | <pre> |
| Taken as a transformation from the universe U% = [u, v] | | Taken as a transformation from the universe U% = [u, v] |
| to the universe X% = [x, y], this is a particular type | | to the universe X% = [x, y], this is a particular type |