Changes

→‎Note 9: markup
Line 431: Line 431:  
==Note 9==
 
==Note 9==
   −
<pre>
+
As an object example, let us consider the "transformation of textual elements" (TOTE) in progress:
By virtue of Zipf's law -- yes, there is a dynamics to its economics --
  −
I have found myself forced, when it comes to matters that I've been
  −
thinking about for "years and years" (YAY) to make a heavy, if not
  −
to say an overbearing use of acronyms, both for their utility as
  −
mnemonic devices and as a "regime of code compression" (ROCC).
  −
I'm well aware that this can be annoying at times, so please
  −
forgive what I hope will be a transient nuisance and I will
  −
do my level best to unpack these lexical quanta as we go.
     −
A "moral of the episode" (MOTE) on the wing here:
+
{| align="center" cellpadding="8" width="90%"
A "transformation of textual elements" (TOTE) is
+
| <math>x ~=~ f(u, v) ~=~ \underline{((}~ u ~\underline{)(}~ v ~\underline{))}</math>
a "formal or mathematical abstraction" (FOMA) of
+
|-
a very high order, to wit, a "formal object" (FO).
+
| <math>y ~=~ g(u, v) ~=~ \underline{((}~ u ~,~ v ~\underline{))}</math>
 +
|}
   −
As an object example, let us consider the TOTE in progress:
+
{| align="center" cellpadding="8" width="90%"
 
+
| <math>(x, y) ~=~ F(u, v) ~=~ ( ~\underline{((}~ u ~\underline{)(}~ v ~\underline{))}~ , ~\underline{((}~ u ~,~ v ~\underline{))}~ ).</math>
<x, y=   F<u, v=   <((u)(v)), ((u, v))>
+
|}
    +
<pre>
 
Taken as a transformation from the universe U% = [u, v]
 
Taken as a transformation from the universe U% = [u, v]
 
to the universe X% = [x, y], this is a particular type
 
to the universe X% = [x, y], this is a particular type
12,089

edits